Quadro K420 vs Quadro M2000

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro K420 and Quadro M2000. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro K420 and Quadro M2000. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

Quadro K420 Check Price

Quadro M2000 Check Price

Main Specs

	Quadro K420	Quadro M2000
Power consumption (TDP)	41 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	128 Bit	128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB/2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort	4x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro M2000 has 82% more power consumption, than Quadro K420.
Quadro K420 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M2000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro M2000 has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro K420.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro K420 is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M2000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro K420 is 80 MHz higher, than Quadro M2000.
Quadro K420 and Quadro M2000 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro M2000 is 41 mm longer, than Quadro K420.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 4830 MHz higher, than Quadro K420.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	21−24
ultra / 1080p	0−1	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	9−10	40−45
medium / 1080p	1−2	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 580% more, than Quadro K420.
high / 1080p	−	30−35
ultra / 1080p	1−2	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 720p	9−10	65−70
medium / 1080p	2−3	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Battlefield 5 is 1000% more, than Quadro K420.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro K420 and Quadro M2000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	100−110	230−240
medium / 768p	75−80	200−210
ultra / 1080p	30−35	120−130
QHD / 1440p	−	90−95
4K / 2160p	9−10	50−55
high / 768p	50−55	170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 187% more, than Quadro K420.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	10−12	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 32% more, than Quadro K420.
low / 768p	65−70	120−130
medium / 768p	35−40	100−110
ultra / 1080p	14−16	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Dota 2 is 160% more, than Quadro K420.
high / 1080p	1−2	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	0−1	8−9
low / 720p	7−8	50−55
medium / 1080p	2−3	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Far Cry 5 is 1066% more, than Quadro K420.
high / 1080p	−	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
low / 720p	40−45	120−130
medium / 1080p	4−5	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Fortnite is 326% more, than Quadro K420.
high / 1080p	1−2	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	12−14
low / 720p	10−12	70−75
medium / 1080p	3−4	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 900% more, than Quadro K420.
low / 768p	35−40	100−110
medium / 768p	−	95−100
high / 1080p	1−2	40−45
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
medium / 720p	30−35	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 284% more, than Quadro K420.
high / 1080p	0−1	12−14
ultra / 1080p	0−1	10−11
QHD / 1440p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	1−2	40−45
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Metro Exodus is 4100% more, than Quadro K420.
low / 768p	85−90	120−130
high / 1080p	50−55	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Minecraft is 43% more, than Quadro K420.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	70−75
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 118% more, than Quadro K420.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	2−3	40−45
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2000% more, than Quadro K420.
low / 768p	4−5	75−80
medium / 768p	−	45−50
high / 1080p	2−3	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
4K / 2160p	0−1	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1600% more, than Quadro K420.
low / 768p	65−70	90−95
medium / 768p	30−35	60−65
ultra / 1080p	10−12	40−45
high / 768p	27−30	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in World of Tanks is 85% more, than Quadro K420.

Full Specs

	Quadro K420	Quadro M2000
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	GK107	GM206
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	22 July 2014	8 April 2016
Pipelines	192	768
Core clock speed	876 MHz	796 MHz
Boost Clock		1163 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	14.02	55.82
Floating-point performance	336.4 gflops	1,812 gflops
Length	160 mm	201 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	6612 MHz
DirectX	12	12
Shader Model	5	5
OpenGL	4.5	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+	+
CUDA	3.0	5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	11 Mh/s	215 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro	+	+
Mosaic	+	+
Width	1" (2.5 cm)	1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays	4	4
nView Desktop Management	+	+
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K420 vs Quadro M2000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares