FirePro W5000 vs Quadro K4200

When choosing between FirePro W5000 and Quadro K4200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W5000 and Quadro K4200.

FirePro W5000 Check Price

Quadro K4200 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro W5000	Quadro K4200
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	108 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K4200 has 44% more power consumption, than FirePro W5000.
FirePro W5000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K4200 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Quadro K4200 has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro W5000.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro W5000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K4200 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FirePro W5000 is 54 MHz higher, than Quadro K4200.
FirePro W5000 and Quadro K4200 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro K4200 is 58 mm longer, than FirePro W5000.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K4200 is 2200 MHz higher, than FirePro W5000.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	21−24
ultra / 1080p	9−10	12−14
QHD / 1440p	4−5	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	30−35	40−45
medium / 1080p	18−20	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 37% more, than FirePro W5000.
high / 1080p	24−27	35−40
ultra / 1080p	21−24	30−33
QHD / 1440p	7−8	14−16
4K / 2160p	5−6	9−10
low / 720p	50−55	70−75
medium / 1080p	27−30	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Battlefield 5 is 43% more, than FirePro W5000.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W5000.
low / 768p	210−220	230−240
medium / 768p	180−190	200−210
ultra / 1080p	95−100	120−130
QHD / 1440p	50−55	100−105
4K / 2160p	30−33	55−60
high / 768p	140−150	170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 23% more, than FirePro W5000.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than FirePro W5000.
low / 768p	110−120	120−130
medium / 768p	90−95	110−120
ultra / 1080p	60−65	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than FirePro W5000.
high / 1080p	18−20	27−30
ultra / 1080p	16−18	24−27
QHD / 1440p	−	20−22
4K / 2160p	6−7	8−9
low / 720p	35−40	55−60
medium / 1080p	18−20	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Far Cry 5 is 52% more, than FirePro W5000.
high / 1080p	24−27	35−40
ultra / 1080p	18−20	27−30
QHD / 1440p	16−18	16−18
low / 720p	95−100	130−140
medium / 1080p	50−55	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Fortnite is 40% more, than FirePro W5000.
high / 1080p	24−27	35−40
ultra / 1080p	20−22	27−30
QHD / 1440p	9−10	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	14−16
low / 720p	50−55	70−75
medium / 1080p	27−30	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 44% more, than FirePro W5000.
low / 768p	85−90	100−110
medium / 768p	75−80	95−100
high / 1080p	30−33	40−45
ultra / 1080p	12−14	18−20
QHD / 1440p	3−4	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 28% more, than FirePro W5000.
high / 1080p	9−10	14−16
ultra / 1080p	7−8	10−12
QHD / 1440p	−	10−12
4K / 2160p	2−3	3−4
low / 720p	27−30	40−45
medium / 1080p	12−14	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than FirePro W5000.
low / 768p	110−120	120−130
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Minecraft is 9% more, than FirePro W5000.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	75−80
medium / 1080p	24−27	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 8% more, than FirePro W5000.
high / 1080p	14−16	16−18
ultra / 1080p	9−10	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	27−30	40−45
medium / 1080p	16−18	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 35% more, than FirePro W5000.
low / 768p	55−60	80−85
medium / 768p	30−35	50−55
high / 1080p	18−20	27−30
ultra / 1080p	10−12	14−16
4K / 2160p	8−9	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 48% more, than FirePro W5000.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	40−45
high / 768p	50−55	55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5000 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Quadro K4200.

Full Specs

	FirePro W5000	Quadro K4200
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Kepler
Code name	Pitcairn	GK104
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	7 August 2012	22 July 2014
Pipelines	768	1344
Core clock speed	825 MHz	771 MHz
Boost Clock		784 MHz
Transistor count	2,800 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	39.60	87.81
Floating-point performance	1,267 gflops	2,107 gflops
Length	183 mm	241 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	3200 MHz	5400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	102.4 GB/s	172.8 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA		3.0
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	154 Mh/s	119 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / half length
DisplayPort count	2
Dual-link DVI support	+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W5000 vs Quadro K4200

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares