FirePro W7000 vs Quadro K4200

When comparing FirePro W7000 and Quadro K4200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W7000 and Quadro K4200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FirePro W7000 Check Price

Quadro K4200 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro W7000	Quadro K4200
Power consumption (TDP)	350 Watt	108 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W7000 has 224% more power consumption, than Quadro K4200.
FirePro W7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K4200 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
FirePro W7000 and Quadro K4200 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro W7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K4200 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FirePro W7000 is 179 MHz higher, than Quadro K4200.
FirePro W7000 and Quadro K4200 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
FirePro W7000 is 1 mm longer, than Quadro K4200.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K4200 is 600 MHz higher, than FirePro W7000.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	21−24	21−24
ultra / 1080p	12−14	12−14
QHD / 1440p	6−7	7−8
4K / 2160p	5−6	5−6
low / 720p	40−45	40−45
medium / 1080p	24−27	27−30
FirePro W7000 and Quadro K4200 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey.
high / 1080p	30−35	35−40
ultra / 1080p	27−30	30−33
QHD / 1440p	12−14	14−16
4K / 2160p	8−9	9−10
low / 720p	65−70	70−75
medium / 1080p	35−40	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Battlefield 5 is 6% more, than FirePro W7000.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro W7000 and Quadro K4200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	230−240	230−240
medium / 768p	200−210	200−210
ultra / 1080p	120−130	120−130
QHD / 1440p	90−95	100−105
4K / 2160p	50−55	55−60
high / 768p	170−180	170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than FirePro W7000.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	50−55
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
FirePro W7000 and Quadro K4200 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	120−130
medium / 768p	100−110	110−120
ultra / 1080p	80−85	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Dota 2 is 2% more, than FirePro W7000.
high / 1080p	24−27	27−30
ultra / 1080p	21−24	24−27
QHD / 1440p	18−20	20−22
4K / 2160p	8−9	8−9
low / 720p	50−55	55−60
medium / 1080p	27−30	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Far Cry 5 is 7% more, than FirePro W7000.
high / 1080p	30−35	35−40
ultra / 1080p	24−27	27−30
QHD / 1440p	16−18	16−18
low / 720p	120−130	130−140
medium / 1080p	70−75	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Fortnite is 9% more, than FirePro W7000.
high / 1080p	35−40	35−40
ultra / 1080p	27−30	27−30
QHD / 1440p	14−16	16−18
4K / 2160p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	70−75	70−75
medium / 1080p	40−45	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 2% more, than FirePro W7000.
low / 768p	100−110	100−110
medium / 768p	95−100	95−100
high / 1080p	40−45	40−45
ultra / 1080p	16−18	18−20
QHD / 1440p	7−8	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 1% more, than FirePro W7000.
high / 1080p	12−14	14−16
ultra / 1080p	10−11	10−12
QHD / 1440p	10−11	10−12
4K / 2160p	3−4	3−4
low / 720p	40−45	40−45
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Metro Exodus is 6% more, than FirePro W7000.
low / 768p	120−130	120−130
medium / 1080p	110−120	110−120
FirePro W7000 and Quadro K4200 have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	70−75	75−80
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than FirePro W7000.
high / 1080p	16−18	16−18
ultra / 1080p	10−11	10−12
QHD / 1440p	2−3	2−3
4K / 2160p	1−2	2−3
low / 720p	40−45	40−45
medium / 1080p	21−24	21−24
FirePro W7000 and Quadro K4200 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2.
low / 768p	75−80	80−85
medium / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	24−27	27−30
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
4K / 2160p	8−9	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 8% more, than FirePro W7000.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	40−45
high / 768p	55−60	55−60
FirePro W7000 and Quadro K4200 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.

Full Specs

	FirePro W7000	Quadro K4200
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Kepler
Code name	Pitcairn	GK104
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	13 June 2012	22 July 2014
Pipelines	1280	1344
Core clock speed	950 MHz	771 MHz
Boost Clock		784 MHz
Transistor count	2,800 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	76.00	87.81
Floating-point performance	2,432 gflops	2,107 gflops
Length	242 mm	241 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4800 MHz	5400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	153.6 GB/s	172.8 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA		3.0
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	285 Mh/s	119 Mh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)	6 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
StereoOutput3D	+
DisplayPort count	4
Dual-link DVI support	+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W7000 vs Quadro K4200

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares