FireStream 9250 vs Quadro K4200
When choosing between FireStream 9250 and Quadro K4200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9250 and Quadro K4200.
FireStream 9250
Main Specs
FireStream 9250
Quadro K4200
Power consumption (TDP)
150 Watt
108 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Check Price
FireStream 9250 has 38% more power consumption, than Quadro K4200.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro K4200 has 3 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Quadro K4200 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K4200 is 146 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K4200 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K4200 is 3414 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
2−3
21−24
ultra / 1080p
1−2
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
12−14
40−45
medium / 1080p
5−6
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 420% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p
7−8
35−40
ultra / 1080p
5−6
30−33
QHD / 1440p
0−1
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
9−10
low / 720p
18−20
70−75
medium / 1080p
7−8
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Battlefield 5 is 388% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
35−40
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FireStream 9250 and Quadro K4200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
120−130
230−240
medium / 768p
95−100
200−210
ultra / 1080p
45−50
120−130
QHD / 1440p
35−40
100−105
4K / 2160p
18−20
55−60
high / 768p
70−75
170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 127% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p
80−85
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
50−55
medium / 1080p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p
75−80
120−130
medium / 768p
50−55
110−120
ultra / 1080p
27−30
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Dota 2 is 105% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p
3−4
27−30
ultra / 1080p
3−4
24−27
QHD / 1440p
−
20−22
4K / 2160p
1−2
8−9
low / 720p
12−14
55−60
medium / 1080p
4−5
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Far Cry 5 is 480% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p
10−12
35−40
ultra / 1080p
6−7
27−30
QHD / 1440p
3−4
16−18
low / 720p
50−55
130−140
medium / 1080p
14−16
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Fortnite is 247% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p
8−9
35−40
ultra / 1080p
6−7
27−30
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
14−16
low / 720p
20−22
70−75
medium / 1080p
10−11
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 309% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p
50−55
100−110
medium / 768p
−
95−100
high / 1080p
8−9
40−45
ultra / 1080p
3−4
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 161% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p
2−3
14−16
ultra / 1080p
0−1
10−12
QHD / 1440p
−
10−12
4K / 2160p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
7−8
40−45
medium / 1080p
4−5
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Metro Exodus is 525% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p
85−90
120−130
high / 1080p
85−90
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
4K / 2160p
75−80
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Minecraft is 43% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
75−80
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p
6−7
16−18
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
7−8
40−45
medium / 1080p
7−8
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 283% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p
16−18
80−85
medium / 768p
12−14
50−55
high / 1080p
6−7
27−30
ultra / 1080p
4−5
14−16
4K / 2160p
2−3
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 362% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
40−45
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
40−45
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in World of Tanks is 46% more, than FireStream 9250.
Full Specs
FireStream 9250
Quadro K4200
Architecture
TeraScale
Kepler
Code name
RV770
GK104
Type
Desktop
Workstation
Release date
16 June 2008
22 July 2014
Pipelines
800
1344
Core clock speed
625 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
784 MHz
Transistor count
956 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
25.00
87.81
Floating-point performance
1,000.0 gflops
2,107 gflops
Length
241 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1986 MHz
5400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
63.55 GB/s
172.8 GB/s
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
4.1
5.1
OpenGL
3.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
119 Mh/s
Check Price
