FireStream 9270 vs Quadro K4200

When choosing between FireStream 9270 and Quadro K4200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9270 and Quadro K4200.

FireStream 9270

Quadro K4200 Check Price

Main Specs

	FireStream 9270	Quadro K4200
Power consumption (TDP)	160 Watt	108 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
		Check Price

FireStream 9270 has 48% more power consumption, than Quadro K4200.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro K4200 has 2 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Quadro K4200 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K4200 is 21 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K4200 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K4200 is 1800 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	5−6	21−24
ultra / 1080p	2−3	12−14
QHD / 1440p	2−3	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	14−16	40−45
medium / 1080p	7−8	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	10−11	35−40
ultra / 1080p	8−9	30−33
QHD / 1440p	0−1	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	9−10
low / 720p	21−24	70−75
medium / 1080p	10−12	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Battlefield 5 is 238% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	130−140	230−240
medium / 768p	100−110	200−210
ultra / 1080p	50−55	120−130
QHD / 1440p	27−30	100−105
4K / 2160p	12−14	55−60
high / 768p	75−80	170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 120% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	50−55	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 46% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	80−85	120−130
medium / 768p	55−60	110−120
ultra / 1080p	30−35	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Dota 2 is 87% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	7−8	27−30
ultra / 1080p	5−6	24−27
QHD / 1440p	−	20−22
4K / 2160p	5−6	8−9
low / 720p	16−18	55−60
medium / 1080p	8−9	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Far Cry 5 is 262% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	7−8	35−40
ultra / 1080p	0−1	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
low / 720p	55−60	130−140
medium / 1080p	18−20	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Fortnite is 196% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	10−11	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	27−30
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	8−9	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	70−75
medium / 1080p	12−14	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 215% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	50−55	100−110
medium / 768p	−	95−100
high / 1080p	10−12	40−45
ultra / 1080p	5−6	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	8−9
medium / 720p	45−50	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 139% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	3−4	14−16
ultra / 1080p	1−2	10−12
QHD / 1440p	−	10−12
4K / 2160p	−	3−4
low / 720p	10−11	40−45
medium / 1080p	5−6	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Metro Exodus is 320% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	90−95	120−130
ultra / 1080p	80−85	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Minecraft is 35% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	6−7	−
ultra / 1080p	2−3	14−16
4K / 2160p	0−1	−
low / 720p	27−30	75−80
medium / 1080p	10−11	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 184% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
QHD / 1440p	−	2−3
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	10−11	40−45
medium / 1080p	9−10	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 220% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	21−24	80−85
medium / 768p	14−16	50−55
high / 1080p	6−7	27−30
ultra / 1080p	4−5	14−16
4K / 2160p	3−4	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 270% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	75−80	90−95
medium / 768p	40−45	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	40−45
high / 768p	30−35	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in World of Tanks is 50% more, than FireStream 9270.

Full Specs

	FireStream 9270	Quadro K4200
Architecture	TeraScale	Kepler
Code name	RV770	GK104
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	13 November 2008	22 July 2014
Pipelines	800	1344
Core clock speed	750 MHz	771 MHz
Boost Clock		784 MHz
Transistor count	956 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	30.00	87.81
Floating-point performance	1,200.0 gflops	2,107 gflops
Length		241 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	3600 MHz	5400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	115.2 GB/s	172.8 GB/s
DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	4.1	5.1
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		119 Mh/s
		Check Price

FireStream 9270 vs Quadro K4200

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares