GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs Quadro K4200
When comparing GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Quadro K4200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 260M SLI and Quadro K4200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 260M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 260M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 260M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 260M SLI
Quadro K4200
Power consumption (TDP)
150 Watt
108 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 260M SLI has 38% more power consumption, than Quadro K4200.
Quadro K4200 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
GeForce GTX 260M SLI is used in Laptops, and Quadro K4200 - in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 260M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Quadro K4200 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K4200 is 221 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
GeForce GTX 260M SLI is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K4200 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K4200 is 4450 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
8−9
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
20−22
40−45
medium / 1080p
10−12
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 136% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
high / 1080p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
12−14
30−33
QHD / 1440p
0−1
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
9−10
low / 720p
30−35
70−75
medium / 1080p
16−18
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Battlefield 5 is 131% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
low / 768p
150−160
230−240
medium / 768p
130−140
200−210
ultra / 1080p
65−70
120−130
QHD / 1440p
35−40
100−105
4K / 2160p
27−30
55−60
high / 768p
95−100
170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 74% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
50−55
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
low / 768p
85−90
120−130
medium / 768p
65−70
110−120
ultra / 1080p
40−45
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Dota 2 is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
high / 1080p
10−11
27−30
ultra / 1080p
9−10
24−27
QHD / 1440p
−
20−22
4K / 2160p
4−5
8−9
low / 720p
24−27
55−60
medium / 1080p
10−12
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Far Cry 5 is 141% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
high / 1080p
16−18
35−40
ultra / 1080p
12−14
27−30
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
70−75
130−140
medium / 1080p
30−33
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Fortnite is 109% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
high / 1080p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
12−14
27−30
QHD / 1440p
3−4
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
70−75
medium / 1080p
16−18
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 143% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
low / 768p
60−65
100−110
medium / 768p
50−55
95−100
high / 1080p
16−18
40−45
ultra / 1080p
8−9
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 88% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
high / 1080p
6−7
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−12
QHD / 1440p
−
10−12
4K / 2160p
1−2
3−4
low / 720p
16−18
40−45
medium / 1080p
8−9
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Metro Exodus is 157% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
low / 768p
95−100
120−130
high / 1080p
95−100
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Minecraft is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
75−80
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
16−18
40−45
medium / 1080p
12−14
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 91% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
low / 768p
30−35
80−85
medium / 768p
21−24
50−55
high / 1080p
10−12
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
14−16
4K / 2160p
6−7
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 131% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
40−45
high / 768p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in World of Tanks is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 260M SLI
Quadro K4200
Architecture
G9x
Kepler
Code name
NB9E-GTX
GK104
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
2 March 2009
22 July 2014
Pipelines
224
1344
Core clock speed
550 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
784 MHz
Transistor count
1508 Million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
87.81
Floating-point performance
2,107 gflops
Length
241 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
950 MHz
5400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
172.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
CUDA
+
3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
119 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price