GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs Quadro K4200
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Quadro K4200. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Quadro K4200. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Quadro K4200
Power consumption (TDP)
134 Watt
108 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
One 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost has 24% more power consumption, than Quadro K4200.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K4200 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Quadro K4200 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Quadro K4200 are build with Kepler architecture.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is 209 MHz higher, than Quadro K4200.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Quadro K4200 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro K4200 is 232 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K4200 is 5394 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
9−10
12−14
QHD / 1440p
3−4
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
30−35
40−45
medium / 1080p
21−24
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
27−30
35−40
ultra / 1080p
21−24
30−33
QHD / 1440p
6−7
14−16
4K / 2160p
5−6
9−10
low / 720p
55−60
70−75
medium / 1080p
30−33
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Battlefield 5 is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Quadro K4200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
210−220
230−240
medium / 768p
180−190
200−210
ultra / 1080p
100−110
120−130
QHD / 1440p
60−65
100−105
4K / 2160p
30−35
55−60
high / 768p
150−160
170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
50−55
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 768p
100−110
110−120
ultra / 1080p
70−75
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Dota 2 is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
20−22
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
24−27
QHD / 1440p
18−20
20−22
4K / 2160p
6−7
8−9
low / 720p
40−45
55−60
medium / 1080p
21−24
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
27−30
35−40
ultra / 1080p
21−24
27−30
QHD / 1440p
12−14
16−18
low / 720p
100−110
130−140
medium / 1080p
60−65
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Fortnite is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
27−30
35−40
ultra / 1080p
21−24
27−30
QHD / 1440p
10−11
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
70−75
medium / 1080p
30−35
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
90−95
100−110
medium / 768p
80−85
95−100
high / 1080p
30−35
40−45
ultra / 1080p
12−14
18−20
QHD / 1440p
3−4
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
10−11
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−12
QHD / 1440p
−
10−12
4K / 2160p
1−2
3−4
low / 720p
30−35
40−45
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Metro Exodus is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 1080p
110−120
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
75−80
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
9−10
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
30−35
40−45
medium / 1080p
16−18
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
60−65
80−85
medium / 768p
35−40
50−55
high / 1080p
21−24
27−30
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
4K / 2160p
6−7
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
40−45
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Quadro K4200
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Code name
GK106
GK104
Type
Desktop
Workstation
Release date
26 March 2013
22 July 2014
Pipelines
768
1344
Core clock speed
980 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
784 MHz
Transistor count
2,540 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
62.7 billion/sec
87.81
Floating-point performance
1,585 gflops
2,107 gflops
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
241 mm
Memory bus width
192 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
6.0 GB/s
5400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
144.2 GB/s
172.8 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
+
3.0
CUDA cores
768
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
4 Displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
54 Mh/s
119 Mh/s
Check Price
Check Price