GeForce GTX 670M vs Quadro K4200
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 670M and Quadro K4200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 670M will be the best choice, for others Quadro K4200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 670M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 670M
Quadro K4200
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
108 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
3 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K4200 has 44% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 670M.
GeForce GTX 670M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro K4200 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Quadro K4200 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 670M.
GeForce GTX 670M is used in Laptops, and Quadro K4200 - in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 670M is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro K4200 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K4200 is 173 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
GeForce GTX 670M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K4200 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K4200 is 3900 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
8−9
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
18−20
40−45
medium / 1080p
10−11
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 160% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
high / 1080p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
12−14
30−33
QHD / 1440p
0−1
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
9−10
low / 720p
27−30
70−75
medium / 1080p
14−16
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Battlefield 5 is 158% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
low / 768p
150−160
230−240
medium / 768p
120−130
200−210
ultra / 1080p
60−65
120−130
QHD / 1440p
35−40
100−105
4K / 2160p
27−30
55−60
high / 768p
90−95
170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
50−55
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
low / 768p
85−90
120−130
medium / 768p
65−70
110−120
ultra / 1080p
40−45
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Dota 2 is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
high / 1080p
10−11
27−30
ultra / 1080p
9−10
24−27
QHD / 1440p
−
20−22
4K / 2160p
4−5
8−9
low / 720p
21−24
55−60
medium / 1080p
10−11
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Far Cry 5 is 163% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
high / 1080p
16−18
35−40
ultra / 1080p
12−14
27−30
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
65−70
130−140
medium / 1080p
27−30
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Fortnite is 122% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
high / 1080p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
12−14
27−30
QHD / 1440p
2−3
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
70−75
medium / 1080p
16−18
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 143% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
low / 768p
55−60
100−110
medium / 768p
50−55
95−100
high / 1080p
14−16
40−45
ultra / 1080p
7−8
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
high / 1080p
5−6
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−12
QHD / 1440p
−
10−12
4K / 2160p
1−2
3−4
low / 720p
14−16
40−45
medium / 1080p
7−8
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
low / 768p
95−100
120−130
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Minecraft is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
75−80
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
14−16
40−45
medium / 1080p
12−14
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 108% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
low / 768p
30−33
80−85
medium / 768p
18−20
50−55
high / 1080p
10−12
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
14−16
4K / 2160p
6−7
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 146% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
40−45
high / 768p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 670M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 670M
Quadro K4200
Architecture
Fermi
Kepler
Code name
N13E-GS1-LP
GK104
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
22 March 2012
22 July 2014
Pipelines
336
1344
Core clock speed
598 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
784 MHz
Transistor count
1,950 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
33.5 billion/sec
87.81
Floating-point performance
803.7 gflops
2,107 gflops
Length
241 mm
Memory bus width
192bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1500 MHz
5400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
72.0 GB/s
172.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 API
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
3.0
CUDA cores
336
Bus support
PCI Express 2.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
Up to 2048x1536
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
53 Mh/s
119 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price