Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Quadro K4200
In this comparison between Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro K4200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Plus Graphics 645 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K4200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Quadro K4200
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
108 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
Memory type
DDR3/DDR4
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K4200 has 620% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro K4200 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K4200 - in Desktops.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is build with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake architecture, and Quadro K4200 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K4200 is 471 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro K4200 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
21−24
ultra / 1080p
2−3
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
12−14
40−45
medium / 1080p
5−6
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
−
35−40
ultra / 1080p
7−8
30−33
QHD / 1440p
0−1
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
9−10
low / 720p
16−18
70−75
medium / 1080p
8−9
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Battlefield 5 is 327% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
100−110
230−240
medium / 768p
80−85
200−210
ultra / 1080p
35−40
120−130
QHD / 1440p
24−27
100−105
4K / 2160p
−
55−60
high / 768p
60−65
170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 170% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
50−55
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 46% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
65−70
120−130
medium / 768p
45−50
110−120
ultra / 1080p
21−24
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Dota 2 is 137% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
5−6
27−30
ultra / 1080p
5−6
24−27
QHD / 1440p
−
20−22
4K / 2160p
3−4
8−9
low / 720p
12−14
55−60
medium / 1080p
5−6
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Far Cry 5 is 383% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
12−14
35−40
ultra / 1080p
8−9
27−30
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
45−50
130−140
medium / 1080p
12−14
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Fortnite is 245% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
8−9
35−40
ultra / 1080p
−
27−30
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
14−16
low / 720p
16−18
70−75
medium / 1080p
9−10
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 354% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
40−45
100−110
medium / 768p
35−40
95−100
high / 1080p
7−8
40−45
ultra / 1080p
5−6
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 186% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
3−4
14−16
ultra / 1080p
2−3
10−12
QHD / 1440p
−
10−12
4K / 2160p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
7−8
40−45
medium / 1080p
4−5
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Metro Exodus is 425% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
85−90
120−130
high / 1080p
80−85
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Minecraft is 43% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
75−80
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
7−8
40−45
medium / 1080p
−
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 271% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
16−18
80−85
medium / 768p
12−14
50−55
high / 1080p
6−7
27−30
ultra / 1080p
5−6
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 340% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
40−45
high / 768p
30−33
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Quadro K4200
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake
Kepler
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
GK104
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
10 July 2019
22 July 2014
Pipelines
48
1344
Core clock speed
300 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
784 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
50.40
87.81
Floating-point performance
2,107 gflops
Length
241 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
5400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
172.8 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.103
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
119 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
