Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Quadro K4200
When choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro K4200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Quadro K4200.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Quadro K4200
Power consumption (TDP)
45 Watt
108 Watt
Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
Memory type
eDRAM
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
128 MB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K4200 has 140% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Quadro K4200 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 124 GB more memory, than Quadro K4200.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K4200 - in Desktops.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Quadro K4200 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K4200 is 571 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Quadro K4200 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
21−24
40−45
medium / 1080p
10−12
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
12−14
30−33
QHD / 1440p
0−1
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
9−10
low / 720p
30−35
70−75
medium / 1080p
16−18
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Battlefield 5 is 131% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
160−170
230−240
medium / 768p
130−140
200−210
ultra / 1080p
65−70
120−130
QHD / 1440p
35−40
100−105
4K / 2160p
27−30
55−60
high / 768p
100−110
170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 68% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
50−55
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 32% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
90−95
120−130
medium / 768p
70−75
110−120
ultra / 1080p
40−45
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Dota 2 is 55% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
10−12
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−11
24−27
QHD / 1440p
−
20−22
4K / 2160p
4−5
8−9
low / 720p
24−27
55−60
medium / 1080p
12−14
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Far Cry 5 is 141% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
18−20
35−40
ultra / 1080p
12−14
27−30
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
70−75
130−140
medium / 1080p
30−35
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Fortnite is 102% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
16−18
35−40
ultra / 1080p
14−16
27−30
QHD / 1440p
3−4
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
70−75
medium / 1080p
18−20
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 129% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
60−65
100−110
medium / 768p
55−60
95−100
high / 1080p
18−20
40−45
ultra / 1080p
8−9
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 83% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
6−7
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−12
QHD / 1440p
−
10−12
4K / 2160p
1−2
3−4
low / 720p
18−20
40−45
medium / 1080p
8−9
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
100−110
120−130
high / 1080p
95−100
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
40−45
75−80
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 48% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
16−18
40−45
medium / 1080p
12−14
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 91% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
30−35
80−85
medium / 768p
21−24
50−55
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
14−16
4K / 2160p
7−8
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 131% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
40−45
high / 768p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in World of Tanks is 18% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Quadro K4200
Architecture
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Kepler
Code name
Haswell GT3e
GK104
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
5 June 2013
22 July 2014
Pipelines
40
1344
Core clock speed
200 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
784 MHz
Transistor count
392 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
22 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
52.00
87.81
Floating-point performance
104.0 gflops
2,107 gflops
Length
241 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
5400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
172.8 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.80
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
119 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
