Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Quadro K4200
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Quadro K4200, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Pro Graphics 580 stacks up against Quadro K4200, check out specs charts below.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 580 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Quadro K4200
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
108 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
64 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K4200 has 620% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro K4200 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 has 60 GB more memory, than Quadro K4200.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K4200 - in Desktops.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Quadro K4200 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K4200 is 421 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro K4200 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
9−10
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
20−22
40−45
medium / 1080p
10−12
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 136% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
12−14
30−33
QHD / 1440p
0−1
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
9−10
low / 720p
30−35
70−75
medium / 1080p
16−18
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Battlefield 5 is 131% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
150−160
230−240
medium / 768p
130−140
200−210
ultra / 1080p
65−70
120−130
QHD / 1440p
35−40
100−105
4K / 2160p
27−30
55−60
high / 768p
95−100
170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 74% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
50−55
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 32% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
90−95
120−130
medium / 768p
70−75
110−120
ultra / 1080p
40−45
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Dota 2 is 55% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
10−11
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−11
24−27
QHD / 1440p
−
20−22
4K / 2160p
4−5
8−9
low / 720p
24−27
55−60
medium / 1080p
10−12
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Far Cry 5 is 141% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
16−18
35−40
ultra / 1080p
12−14
27−30
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
70−75
130−140
medium / 1080p
30−35
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Fortnite is 109% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
12−14
27−30
QHD / 1440p
3−4
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
70−75
medium / 1080p
18−20
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 143% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
60−65
100−110
medium / 768p
50−55
95−100
high / 1080p
16−18
40−45
ultra / 1080p
8−9
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 88% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
6−7
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−12
QHD / 1440p
−
10−12
4K / 2160p
1−2
3−4
low / 720p
16−18
40−45
medium / 1080p
8−9
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Metro Exodus is 157% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
95−100
120−130
high / 1080p
95−100
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
75−80
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 60% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
16−18
40−45
medium / 1080p
12−14
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 91% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
30−35
80−85
medium / 768p
21−24
50−55
high / 1080p
10−12
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
14−16
4K / 2160p
6−7
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 131% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
24−27
40−45
high / 768p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in World of Tanks is 18% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Quadro K4200
Architecture
Gen. 9 Skylake
Kepler
Code name
Skylake GT4e
GK104
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
1 September 2015
22 July 2014
Pipelines
72
1344
Core clock speed
350 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
784 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
72.00
87.81
Floating-point performance
2,107 gflops
Length
241 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
5400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
172.8 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.97
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
119 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
