NVS 510 vs Quadro K4200

When comparing NVS 510 and Quadro K4200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between NVS 510 and Quadro K4200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

NVS 510 Check Price

Quadro K4200 Check Price

Main Specs

	NVS 510	Quadro K4200
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	108 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K4200 has 208% more power consumption, than NVS 510.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro K4200 has 2 GB more memory, than NVS 510.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
NVS 510 and Quadro K4200 are build with Kepler architecture.
Core clock speed of NVS 510 is 26 MHz higher, than Quadro K4200.
NVS 510 and Quadro K4200 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro K4200 is 81 mm longer, than NVS 510.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K4200 is 3618 MHz higher, than NVS 510.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	1−2	40−45
medium / 1080p	0−1	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 4100% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	30−33
QHD / 1440p	0−1	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	9−10
low / 720p	0−1	70−75
medium / 1080p	−	35−40
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
NVS 510 and Quadro K4200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	60−65	230−240
medium / 768p	27−30	200−210
ultra / 1080p	7−8	120−130
QHD / 1440p	−	100−105
4K / 2160p	−	55−60
high / 768p	16−18	170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 560% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
NVS 510 and Quadro K4200 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	45−50	120−130
medium / 768p	10−11	110−120
ultra / 1080p	0−1	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
QHD / 1440p	−	20−22
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 720p	0−1	55−60
medium / 1080p	−	27−30
high / 1080p	−	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	27−30
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
low / 720p	21−24	130−140
medium / 1080p	0−1	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Fortnite is 513% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	0−1	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	14−16
low / 720p	0−1	70−75
medium / 1080p	0−1	40−45
low / 768p	18−20	100−110
medium / 768p	−	95−100
high / 1080p	0−1	40−45
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 452% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
QHD / 1440p	−	10−12
4K / 2160p	−	3−4
low / 720p	0−1	40−45
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
low / 768p	75−80	120−130
high / 1080p	27−30	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Minecraft is 62% more, than NVS 510.
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	75−80
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 862% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
QHD / 1440p	−	2−3
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	0−1	40−45
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
low / 768p	0−1	80−85
medium / 768p	−	50−55
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	9−10
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	40−45
high / 768p	12−14	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than NVS 510.

Full Specs

	NVS 510	Quadro K4200
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Code name	GK107	GK104
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	23 October 2012	22 July 2014
Pipelines	192	1344
Core clock speed	797 MHz	771 MHz
Boost Clock		784 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	12.75	87.81
Floating-point performance	306.0 gflops	2,107 gflops
Length	160 mm	241 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	5400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s	172.8 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0	3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	17 Mh/s	119 Mh/s
	Check Price	Check Price

NVS 510 vs Quadro K4200

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares