Quadro 2000M vs Quadro K4200
When comparing Quadro 2000M and Quadro K4200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 2000M and Quadro K4200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro 2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 2000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro 2000M
Quadro K4200
Power consumption (TDP)
55 Watt
108 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K4200 has 96% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000M.
Quadro 2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Quadro K4200 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Quadro K4200 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000M.
Quadro 2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro K4200 - in Desktops.
Quadro 2000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro K4200 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K4200 is 221 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
Quadro 2000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K4200 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K4200 is 4500 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
1−2
40−45
medium / 1080p
0−1
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 4100% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
−
35−40
ultra / 1080p
−
30−33
QHD / 1440p
0−1
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
9−10
low / 720p
0−1
70−75
medium / 1080p
−
35−40
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Quadro 2000M and Quadro K4200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
60−65
230−240
medium / 768p
27−30
200−210
ultra / 1080p
7−8
120−130
QHD / 1440p
−
100−105
4K / 2160p
−
55−60
high / 768p
16−18
170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 560% more, than Quadro 2000M.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
50−55
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
Quadro 2000M and Quadro K4200 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
45−50
120−130
medium / 768p
10−11
110−120
ultra / 1080p
0−1
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
24−27
QHD / 1440p
−
20−22
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 720p
0−1
55−60
medium / 1080p
−
27−30
high / 1080p
−
35−40
ultra / 1080p
−
27−30
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
21−24
130−140
medium / 1080p
0−1
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Fortnite is 513% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
0−1
35−40
ultra / 1080p
−
27−30
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
14−16
low / 720p
0−1
70−75
medium / 1080p
0−1
40−45
low / 768p
18−20
100−110
medium / 768p
−
95−100
high / 1080p
0−1
40−45
ultra / 1080p
−
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 452% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
10−12
QHD / 1440p
−
10−12
4K / 2160p
−
3−4
low / 720p
0−1
40−45
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
low / 768p
75−80
120−130
high / 1080p
27−30
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Minecraft is 62% more, than Quadro 2000M.
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
8−9
75−80
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 862% more, than Quadro 2000M.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
10−12
QHD / 1440p
−
2−3
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
0−1
40−45
medium / 1080p
−
21−24
low / 768p
0−1
80−85
medium / 768p
−
50−55
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
9−10
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
40−45
high / 768p
12−14
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Quadro 2000M.
Full Specs
Quadro 2000M
Quadro K4200
Architecture
Fermi
Kepler
Code name
Fermi
GK104
Type
Mobile workstation
Workstation
Release date
22 February 2011
22 July 2014
Pipelines
192
1344
Core clock speed
550 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
784 MHz
Transistor count
1,170 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
17.60
87.81
Floating-point performance
422.4 gflops
2,107 gflops
Length
241 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
900 MHz
5400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
172.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
2.1
3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
27 Mh/s
119 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Check Price
Check Price