Quadro K4200 vs Quadro M3000M

In this comparison between Quadro K4200 and Quadro M3000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K4200 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M3000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro M3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro M3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M3000M here:

Main Specs

  Quadro K4200 Quadro M3000M
Power consumption (TDP) 108 Watt 75 Watt
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin None
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort No outputs
  Check Price Check Price
  • Quadro K4200 has 44% more power consumption, than Quadro M3000M.
  • Quadro K4200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M3000M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
  • Quadro K4200 and Quadro M3000M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
  • Quadro K4200 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M3000M - in Mobile workstations.
  • Quadro K4200 is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M3000M - with Maxwell.
  • Core clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 279 MHz higher, than Quadro K4200.
  • Quadro K4200 and Quadro M3000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
  • Memory clock speed of Quadro K4200 is 400 MHz higher, than Quadro M3000M.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 21−24 35−40
ultra / 1080p 12−14 21−24
QHD / 1440p 7−8 16−18
4K / 2160p 5−6 10−11
low / 720p 40−45 60−65
medium / 1080p 27−30 40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 68% more, than Quadro K4200.

Full Specs

  Quadro K4200 Quadro M3000M
Architecture Kepler Maxwell
Code name GK104 GM204
Type Workstation Mobile workstation
Release date 22 July 2014 2 October 2015
Pipelines 1344 1,024
Core clock speed 771 MHz 1050 MHz
Boost Clock 784 MHz
Transistor count 3,540 million 5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 87.81 67.20
Floating-point performance 2,107 gflops 2,150 gflops
Length 241 mm
Memory bus width 256 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 5400 MHz 5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth 172.8 GB/s 160 GB/s
Shared memory -
DirectX 12 (11_0) 12
Shader Model 5.1 5.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
OpenCL 1.2 1.2
Vulkan 1.1.126 1.1.126
CUDA 3.0 5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 119 Mh/s 253 Mh/s
Laptop size large
Optimus +
Display Port 1.2
3D Vision Pro +
Mosaic +
nView Display Management +
  Check Price Check Price