NVS 510 vs Quadro K5000

In this comparison between NVS 510 and Quadro K5000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people NVS 510 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K5000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

NVS 510 Check Price

Quadro K5000 Check Price

Main Specs

	NVS 510	Quadro K5000
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	122 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K5000 has 248% more power consumption, than NVS 510.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro K5000 has 2 GB more memory, than NVS 510.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
NVS 510 and Quadro K5000 are build with Kepler architecture.
Core clock speed of NVS 510 is 91 MHz higher, than Quadro K5000.
NVS 510 and Quadro K5000 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro K5000 is 107 mm longer, than NVS 510.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K5000 is 3618 MHz higher, than NVS 510.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	20−22
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	1−2	35−40
medium / 1080p	0−1	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−12
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	0−1	65−70
medium / 1080p	−	35−40
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
NVS 510 and Quadro K5000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	60−65	230−240
medium / 768p	27−30	200−210
ultra / 1080p	7−8	110−120
QHD / 1440p	−	85−90
4K / 2160p	−	45−50
high / 768p	16−18	160−170
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 542% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
NVS 510 and Quadro K5000 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	45−50	120−130
medium / 768p	10−11	100−110
ultra / 1080p	0−1	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Dota 2 is 296% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	0−1	50−55
medium / 1080p	−	24−27
high / 1080p	−	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
QHD / 1440p	−	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	120−130
medium / 1080p	0−1	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Fortnite is 468% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	0−1	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	12−14
low / 720p	0−1	65−70
medium / 1080p	0−1	35−40
low / 768p	18−20	100−110
medium / 768p	−	90−95
high / 1080p	0−1	40−45
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 452% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	0−1	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	16−18
low / 768p	75−80	120−130
high / 1080p	27−30	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Minecraft is 62% more, than NVS 510.
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	70−75
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 800% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	−	1−2
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	0−1	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	20−22
low / 768p	0−1	70−75
medium / 768p	−	45−50
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	40−45
high / 768p	12−14	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than NVS 510.

Full Specs

	NVS 510	Quadro K5000
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Code name	GK107	GK104
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	23 October 2012	17 August 2012
Pipelines	192	1536
Core clock speed	797 MHz	706 MHz
Transistor count	1,270 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	12.75	90.37
Floating-point performance	306.0 gflops	2,169 gflops
Length	160 mm	267 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1782 MHz	5400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.51 GB/s	172.8 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0	3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	17 Mh/s	111 Mh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)		2.2 Mh/s
	Check Price	Check Price

NVS 510 vs Quadro K5000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares