Quadro K5000 vs Radeon RX 460 mobile
In this comparison between Quadro K5000 and Radeon RX 460 mobile you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K5000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX 460 mobile will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon RX 460 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 460 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 460 mobile here:
Main Specs
Quadro K5000
Radeon RX 460 mobile
Power consumption (TDP)
122 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K5000 has 121% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
Quadro K5000 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon RX 460 mobile uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Quadro K5000 and Radeon RX 460 mobile have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Quadro K5000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - in Laptops.
Quadro K5000 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - with Polaris.
Quadro K5000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 460 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 460 mobile is 600 MHz higher, than Quadro K5000.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
20−22
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
9−10
QHD / 1440p
6−7
3−4
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
35−40
30−35
medium / 1080p
24−27
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 17% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
high / 1080p
30−35
27−30
ultra / 1080p
27−30
21−24
QHD / 1440p
10−12
6−7
4K / 2160p
7−8
5−6
low / 720p
65−70
55−60
medium / 1080p
35−40
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Battlefield 5 is 20% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Quadro K5000 and Radeon RX 460 mobile have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
230−240
210−220
medium / 768p
200−210
180−190
ultra / 1080p
110−120
100−110
QHD / 1440p
85−90
60−65
4K / 2160p
45−50
30−35
high / 768p
160−170
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
40−45
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 768p
100−110
100−110
ultra / 1080p
75−80
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
high / 1080p
24−27
20−22
ultra / 1080p
21−24
18−20
QHD / 1440p
18−20
18−20
4K / 2160p
7−8
6−7
low / 720p
50−55
40−45
medium / 1080p
24−27
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Far Cry 5 is 19% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
high / 1080p
30−35
27−30
ultra / 1080p
24−27
21−24
QHD / 1440p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
120−130
100−110
medium / 1080p
70−75
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Fortnite is 17% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
high / 1080p
30−35
27−30
ultra / 1080p
24−27
21−24
QHD / 1440p
12−14
10−11
4K / 2160p
12−14
−
low / 720p
65−70
55−60
medium / 1080p
35−40
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 16% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
90−95
80−85
high / 1080p
40−45
30−35
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
QHD / 1440p
6−7
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 18% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
high / 1080p
12−14
10−11
ultra / 1080p
10−11
8−9
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
35−40
30−35
medium / 1080p
16−18
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Metro Exodus is 23% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 1080p
110−120
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
70−75
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
10−11
9−10
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
35−40
30−35
medium / 1080p
20−22
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
medium / 768p
45−50
35−40
high / 1080p
24−27
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
4K / 2160p
8−9
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 17% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
35−40
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Radeon RX 460 mobile.
Full Specs
Quadro K5000
Radeon RX 460 mobile
Architecture
Kepler
Polaris
Code name
GK104
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
17 August 2012
8 August 2016
Pipelines
1536
896
Core clock speed
706 MHz
Boost Clock
1180 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
90.37
66.08
Floating-point performance
2,169 gflops
2,115 gflops
Length
267 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5400 MHz
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
172.8 GB/s
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
3.0
FreeSync
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
111 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
2.2 Mh/s
Check Price
Check Price
