FirePro S7000 vs Quadro K5000M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro S7000 and Quadro K5000M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro S7000 stacks up against Quadro K5000M, check out specs charts below.
FirePro S7000
Quadro K5000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K5000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K5000M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S7000 | Quadro K5000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 250% more power consumption, than Quadro K5000M.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K5000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FirePro S7000 and Quadro K5000M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K5000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K5000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 244 MHz higher, than Quadro K5000M.
- FirePro S7000 and Quadro K5000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 1800 MHz higher, than Quadro K5000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 35% more, than Quadro K5000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 28% more, than Quadro K5000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K5000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 20% more, than Quadro K5000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Quadro K5000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 15% more, than Quadro K5000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 35% more, than Quadro K5000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 22% more, than Quadro K5000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 29% more, than Quadro K5000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than Quadro K5000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than Quadro K5000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 9% more, than Quadro K5000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| FirePro S7000 and Quadro K5000M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 27% more, than Quadro K5000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 29% more, than Quadro K5000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in World of Tanks is 3% more, than FirePro S7000. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7000 | Quadro K5000M | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Pitcairn | N14E-Q5 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 27 August 2012 | 1 June 2012 |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 1344 |
| Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 706 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 67.31 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 1,615 gflops |
| Length | 292 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | 51 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |