GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro K5000M
When choosing between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro K5000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro K5000M.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro K5000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K5000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K5000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Quadro K5000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 60% more power consumption, than Quadro K5000M.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K5000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K5000M has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K5000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K5000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 73 MHz higher, than Quadro K5000M.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K5000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 1008 MHz higher, than Quadro K5000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Battlefield 5 is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Quadro K5000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Dota 2 is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Far Cry 5 is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Fortnite is 48% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in World of Tanks is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Quadro K5000M | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GF114 | N14E-Q5 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 1 June 2012 |
Pipelines | 336 | 1344 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 706 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 67.31 |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | 1,615 gflops |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 2.1 | + |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | 51 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |