GeForce GTX 465 vs Quadro K5000M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 465 and Quadro K5000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 465 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K5000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K5000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K5000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K5000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 465
Quadro K5000M
Power consumption (TDP)
200 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
Two 6-pins
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 465 has 100% more power consumption, than Quadro K5000M.
GeForce GTX 465 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K5000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Quadro K5000M has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 465.
GeForce GTX 465 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K5000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 465 is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro K5000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 465 is 509 MHz higher, than Quadro K5000M.
GeForce GTX 465 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K5000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K5000M is 1397 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 465.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
3−4
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
30−33
30−35
medium / 1080p
18−20
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
21−24
24−27
ultra / 1080p
20−22
21−24
QHD / 1440p
6−7
9−10
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
50−55
55−60
medium / 1080p
24−27
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Battlefield 5 is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 465 and Quadro K5000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
200−210
210−220
medium / 768p
170−180
180−190
ultra / 1080p
95−100
100−110
QHD / 1440p
50−55
55−60
4K / 2160p
30−33
30−35
high / 768p
130−140
140−150
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
35−40
40−45
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
medium / 768p
90−95
95−100
ultra / 1080p
60−65
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Dota 2 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
16−18
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
6−7
6−7
low / 720p
35−40
40−45
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Far Cry 5 is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
24−27
24−27
ultra / 1080p
18−20
20−22
QHD / 1440p
16−18
16−18
low / 720p
95−100
100−110
medium / 1080p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Fortnite is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
24−27
27−30
ultra / 1080p
18−20
21−24
QHD / 1440p
8−9
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
50−55
55−60
medium / 1080p
27−30
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
70−75
80−85
high / 1080p
27−30
30−35
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
QHD / 1440p
2−3
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
9−10
10−11
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
4K / 2160p
2−3
3−4
low / 720p
27−30
30−35
medium / 1080p
12−14
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Metro Exodus is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
100−110
GeForce GTX 465 and Quadro K5000M have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
high / 1080p
21−24
21−24
ultra / 1080p
16−18
18−20
low / 720p
55−60
60−65
medium / 1080p
24−27
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
14−16
14−16
ultra / 1080p
9−10
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
30−35
medium / 1080p
16−18
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
50−55
55−60
medium / 768p
30−35
35−40
high / 1080p
18−20
20−22
ultra / 1080p
10−11
10−12
4K / 2160p
8−9
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
100−110
100−110
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
35−40
high / 768p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 465
Quadro K5000M
Architecture
Fermi
Kepler
Code name
GF100
N14E-Q5
Type
Desktop
Mobile workstation
Release date
31 May 2010
1 June 2012
Pipelines
352
1344
Core clock speed
1215 MHz
706 MHz
Transistor count
3,100 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
26.7 billion/sec
67.31
Floating-point performance
855.4 gflops
1,615 gflops
Length
9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width
256 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1603 MHz (3206 data rate)
3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
102.6 GB/s
96 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.2
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
+
CUDA cores
352
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0 x 16
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
64 Mh/s
51 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Compute performance
30x
Check Price
Check Price