GeForce GTX 850A vs Quadro K5000M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 850A and Quadro K5000M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 850A stacks up against Quadro K5000M, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 850A
Quadro K5000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K5000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K5000M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 850A | Quadro K5000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K5000M has 122% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 850A.
- GeForce GTX 850A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K5000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K5000M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 850A.
- GeForce GTX 850A is used in Desktops, and Quadro K5000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 850A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro K5000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 850A is 196 MHz higher, than Quadro K5000M.
- GeForce GTX 850A and Quadro K5000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K5000M is 1200 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 850A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 283% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 850A and Quadro K5000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 98% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| GeForce GTX 850A and Quadro K5000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Dota 2 is 82% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Far Cry 5 is 400% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Fortnite is 181% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 333% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 155% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Minecraft is 19% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 320% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in World of Tanks is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 850A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 850A | Quadro K5000M | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | GM107 | N14E-Q5 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 1 June 2012 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1344 |
| Core clock speed | 902 MHz | 706 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 936 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 37.44 | 67.31 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,198 gflops | 1,615 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 51 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |