GRID K240Q vs Quadro K5000M
When comparing GRID K240Q and Quadro K5000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K240Q and Quadro K5000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K240Q
Quadro K5000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K5000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K5000M here:
Main Specs
| GRID K240Q | Quadro K5000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 125% more power consumption, than Quadro K5000M.
- GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K5000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K5000M has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GRID K240Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro K5000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K240Q and Quadro K5000M are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 39 MHz higher, than Quadro K5000M.
- GRID K240Q and Quadro K5000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 2000 MHz higher, than Quadro K5000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K240Q and Quadro K5000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 26% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Dota 2 is 25% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Fortnite is 40% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 57% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 37% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Metro Exodus is 55% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Minecraft is 6% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 33% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 38% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 50% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in World of Tanks is 18% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K240Q | Quadro K5000M | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | GK104 | N14E-Q5 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 1 June 2012 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 1344 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 706 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 67.31 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 1,615 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 51 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |