GRID M60 8Q vs Quadro K5000M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID M60 8Q and Quadro K5000M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID M60 8Q stacks up against Quadro K5000M, check out specs charts below.
GRID M60 8Q
Quadro K5000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K5000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K5000M here:
Main Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Quadro K5000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 8Q has 125% more power consumption, than Quadro K5000M.
- GRID M60 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K5000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GRID M60 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro K5000M.
- GRID M60 8Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro K5000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M60 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K5000M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K5000M is 149 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GRID M60 8Q and Quadro K5000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 2012 MHz higher, than Quadro K5000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 28% more, than Quadro K5000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 20% more, than Quadro K5000M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K5000M. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than Quadro K5000M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Quadro K5000M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 9% more, than Quadro K5000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 25% more, than Quadro K5000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 20% more, than Quadro K5000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 14% more, than Quadro K5000M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than Quadro K5000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than Quadro K5000M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 9% more, than Quadro K5000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
GRID M60 8Q and Quadro K5000M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than Quadro K5000M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 22% more, than Quadro K5000M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GRID M60 8Q. |
Full Specs
GRID M60 8Q | Quadro K5000M | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GM204 | N14E-Q5 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 1 June 2012 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1344 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 706 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 67.31 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 1,615 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | + |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 51 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |