Quadro K5000M vs Quadro T2000 Max Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro K5000M and Quadro T2000 Max Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro K5000M stacks up against Quadro T2000 Max Q, check out specs charts below.
Quadro K5000M and Quadro T2000 Max Q are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Quadro K5000M and Quadro T2000 Max Q are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K5000M or Quadro T2000 Max Q here:
Main Specs
Quadro K5000M
Quadro T2000 Max Q
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
40 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K5000M has 150% more power consumption, than Quadro T2000 Max Q.
Quadro K5000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro T2000 Max Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro K5000M and Quadro T2000 Max Q have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Quadro K5000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - with Turing.
Core clock speed of Quadro T2000 Max Q is 224 MHz higher, than Quadro K5000M.
Quadro K5000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - by 12 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 Max Q is 5000 MHz higher, than Quadro K5000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
35−40
ultra / 1080p
9−10
21−24
QHD / 1440p
4−5
16−18
4K / 2160p
4−5
10−11
low / 720p
30−35
60−65
medium / 1080p
20−22
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 128% more, than Quadro K5000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
45−50
QHD / 1440p
9−10
35−40
4K / 2160p
6−7
18−20
low / 720p
55−60
100−110
medium / 1080p
27−30
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 116% more, than Quadro K5000M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K5000M.
low / 768p
210−220
250−260
medium / 768p
180−190
220−230
ultra / 1080p
100−110
180−190
QHD / 1440p
55−60
110−120
4K / 2160p
30−35
70−75
high / 768p
140−150
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than Quadro K5000M.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K5000M.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 768p
95−100
110−120
ultra / 1080p
65−70
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Dota 2 is 23% more, than Quadro K5000M.
high / 1080p
18−20
45−50
ultra / 1080p
16−18
40−45
QHD / 1440p
16−18
27−30
4K / 2160p
6−7
14−16
low / 720p
40−45
80−85
medium / 1080p
21−24
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 115% more, than Quadro K5000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
45−50
QHD / 1440p
16−18
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
100−110
180−190
medium / 1080p
55−60
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Fortnite is 93% more, than Quadro K5000M.
high / 1080p
27−30
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
45−50
QHD / 1440p
10−11
30−35
4K / 2160p
10−11
24−27
low / 720p
55−60
100−110
medium / 1080p
30−35
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 107% more, than Quadro K5000M.
low / 768p
90−95
140−150
medium / 768p
80−85
120−130
high / 1080p
30−35
70−75
ultra / 1080p
12−14
30−35
QHD / 1440p
4−5
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 75% more, than Quadro K5000M.
high / 1080p
10−11
24−27
ultra / 1080p
8−9
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
3−4
8−9
low / 720p
30−35
65−70
medium / 1080p
14−16
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 121% more, than Quadro K5000M.
low / 768p
110−120
130−140
medium / 1080p
100−110
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Minecraft is 18% more, than Quadro K5000M.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
18−20
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
100−110
medium / 1080p
24−27
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than Quadro K5000M.
high / 1080p
14−16
24−27
ultra / 1080p
10−11
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
30−35
65−70
medium / 1080p
16−18
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Quadro K5000M.
low / 768p
55−60
130−140
medium / 768p
35−40
85−90
high / 1080p
20−22
45−50
ultra / 1080p
10−12
24−27
4K / 2160p
8−9
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 129% more, than Quadro K5000M.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
50−55
high / 768p
55−60
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Quadro K5000M.
Full Specs
Quadro K5000M
Quadro T2000 Max Q
Architecture
Kepler
Turing
Code name
N14E-Q5
N19P-Q3 MAX-Q
Type
Mobile workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
1 June 2012
27 May 2019
Pipelines
1344
1024
Core clock speed
706 MHz
930 / 1200 MHz
Boost Clock
1500 / 1620 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
12 nm
Texture fill rate
67.31
103.7
Floating-point performance
1,615 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
3000 MHz
8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
96 GB/s
128.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.5
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
7.5
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
51 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
medium sized
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price