Quadro K5000M vs Radeon R7 M270DX
In this comparison between Quadro K5000M and Radeon R7 M270DX you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K5000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M270DX will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M270DX
Quadro K5000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K5000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K5000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K5000M | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | IGP |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K5000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 M270DX uses IGP interface.
- Quadro K5000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 M270DX - in Desktops.
- Quadro K5000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M270DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 M270DX is 194 MHz higher, than Quadro K5000M.
- Quadro K5000M and Radeon R7 M270DX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 283% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Battlefield 5 is 350% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270DX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K5000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 108% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Dota 2 is 93% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Far Cry 5 is 425% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Fortnite is 177% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 285% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 187% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Metro Exodus is 533% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Minecraft is 22% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 433% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 440% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K5000M | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | N14E-Q5 | Topaz |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 June 2012 | 11 June 2014 |
| Pipelines | 1344 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 706 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 940 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 67.31 | 22.56 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,615 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 51 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |