Quadro K5000M vs Radeon RX 460
In this comparison between Quadro K5000M and Radeon RX 460 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K5000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX 460 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K5000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K5000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K5000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K5000M
Radeon RX 460
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K5000M has 33% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 460.
Quadro K5000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon RX 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Quadro K5000M and Radeon RX 460 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Quadro K5000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon RX 460 - in Desktops.
Quadro K5000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX 460 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon RX 460 is 384 MHz higher, than Quadro K5000M.
Quadro K5000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 460 is 4000 MHz higher, than Quadro K5000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
9−10
12−14
QHD / 1440p
4−5
7−8
4K / 2160p
4−5
5−6
low / 720p
30−35
40−45
medium / 1080p
20−22
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 35% more, than Quadro K5000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
30−35
ultra / 1080p
21−24
27−30
QHD / 1440p
9−10
12−14
4K / 2160p
6−7
8−9
low / 720p
55−60
70−75
medium / 1080p
27−30
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in Battlefield 5 is 28% more, than Quadro K5000M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K5000M.
low / 768p
210−220
230−240
medium / 768p
180−190
200−210
ultra / 1080p
100−110
120−130
QHD / 1440p
55−60
95−100
4K / 2160p
30−35
50−55
high / 768p
140−150
170−180
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 20% more, than Quadro K5000M.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
50−55
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Quadro K5000M.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 768p
95−100
100−110
ultra / 1080p
65−70
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in Dota 2 is 11% more, than Quadro K5000M.
high / 1080p
18−20
24−27
ultra / 1080p
16−18
24−27
QHD / 1440p
16−18
20−22
4K / 2160p
6−7
8−9
low / 720p
40−45
50−55
medium / 1080p
21−24
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in Far Cry 5 is 30% more, than Quadro K5000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
30−35
ultra / 1080p
20−22
24−27
QHD / 1440p
16−18
16−18
low / 720p
100−110
120−130
medium / 1080p
55−60
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in Fortnite is 20% more, than Quadro K5000M.
high / 1080p
27−30
35−40
ultra / 1080p
21−24
27−30
QHD / 1440p
10−11
14−16
4K / 2160p
10−11
12−14
low / 720p
55−60
70−75
medium / 1080p
30−35
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than Quadro K5000M.
low / 768p
90−95
100−110
medium / 768p
80−85
95−100
high / 1080p
30−35
40−45
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
QHD / 1440p
4−5
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 17% more, than Quadro K5000M.
high / 1080p
10−11
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−11
QHD / 1440p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
3−4
3−4
low / 720p
30−35
40−45
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in Metro Exodus is 21% more, than Quadro K5000M.
low / 768p
110−120
120−130
medium / 1080p
100−110
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in Minecraft is 9% more, than Quadro K5000M.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
18−20
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
70−75
medium / 1080p
24−27
18−20
Quadro K5000M and Radeon RX 460 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
10−11
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
30−35
40−45
medium / 1080p
16−18
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 27% more, than Quadro K5000M.
low / 768p
55−60
75−80
medium / 768p
35−40
45−50
high / 1080p
20−22
24−27
ultra / 1080p
10−12
14−16
4K / 2160p
8−9
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than Quadro K5000M.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
40−45
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon RX 460.
Full Specs
Quadro K5000M
Radeon RX 460
Architecture
Kepler
Polaris
Code name
N14E-Q5
Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type
Mobile workstation
Desktop
Release date
1 June 2012
8 August 2016
Pipelines
1344
896
Core clock speed
706 MHz
1090 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
67.31
67.20
Floating-point performance
1,615 gflops
2,150 gflops
Length
170 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
3000 MHz
7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
96 GB/s
112.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
51 Mh/s
240 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price