Quadro K5000M vs Radeon RX 480 mobile
In this comparison between Quadro K5000M and Radeon RX 480 mobile you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K5000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX 480 mobile will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K5000M and Radeon RX 480 mobile are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Quadro K5000M and Radeon RX 480 mobile are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K5000M or Radeon RX 480 mobile here:
Main Specs
Quadro K5000M
Radeon RX 480 mobile
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
MXM-B (3.0)
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
8 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 100 Watt.
Both video cards are using MXM-B (3.0) interface connection to a motherboard.
Radeon RX 480 mobile has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro K5000M.
Quadro K5000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon RX 480 mobile - in Laptops.
Quadro K5000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX 480 mobile - with Polaris.
Quadro K5000M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 480 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 480 mobile is 5000 MHz higher, than Quadro K5000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
12−14
ultra / 1080p
9−10
7−8
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
4K / 2160p
4−5
−
low / 720p
30−35
27−30
medium / 1080p
20−22
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile.
high / 1080p
24−27
20−22
ultra / 1080p
21−24
16−18
QHD / 1440p
9−10
0−1
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
low / 720p
55−60
45−50
medium / 1080p
27−30
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K5000M.
low / 768p
210−220
190−200
medium / 768p
180−190
160−170
ultra / 1080p
100−110
85−90
QHD / 1440p
55−60
45−50
4K / 2160p
30−35
24−27
high / 768p
140−150
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 14% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 480 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Quadro K5000M.
low / 768p
110−120
100−110
medium / 768p
95−100
85−90
ultra / 1080p
65−70
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile.
high / 1080p
18−20
14−16
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
4−5
low / 720p
40−45
30−35
medium / 1080p
21−24
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Far Cry 5 is 31% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile.
high / 1080p
24−27
21−24
ultra / 1080p
20−22
16−18
QHD / 1440p
16−18
10−12
low / 720p
100−110
90−95
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Fortnite is 18% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile.
high / 1080p
27−30
21−24
ultra / 1080p
21−24
16−18
QHD / 1440p
10−11
5−6
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
low / 720p
55−60
45−50
medium / 1080p
30−35
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 30% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile.
low / 768p
90−95
75−80
medium / 768p
80−85
70−75
high / 1080p
30−35
24−27
ultra / 1080p
12−14
10−11
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 19% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile.
high / 1080p
10−11
7−8
ultra / 1080p
8−9
6−7
4K / 2160p
3−4
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
24−27
medium / 1080p
14−16
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile.
low / 768p
110−120
100−110
ultra / 1080p
−
100−110
medium / 1080p
100−110
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
18−20
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
50−55
medium / 1080p
24−27
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 25% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile.
high / 1080p
14−16
10−12
ultra / 1080p
10−11
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
24−27
medium / 1080p
16−18
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 28% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile.
low / 768p
55−60
45−50
medium / 768p
35−40
27−30
high / 1080p
20−22
16−18
ultra / 1080p
10−12
9−10
4K / 2160p
8−9
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 28% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
35−40
30−35
high / 768p
55−60
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in World of Tanks is 12% more, than Radeon RX 480 mobile.
Full Specs
Quadro K5000M
Radeon RX 480 mobile
Architecture
Kepler
Polaris
Code name
N14E-Q5
Polaris
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
1 June 2012
1 August 2016
Pipelines
1344
2304
Core clock speed
706 MHz
Boost Clock
1077 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
67.31
155.1
Floating-point performance
1,615 gflops
4,963 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
3000 MHz
8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
96 GB/s
256.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
51 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
large
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
