FirePro S7000 vs Quadro K5100M
In this comparison between FirePro S7000 and Quadro K5100M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S7000 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K5100M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S7000
Quadro K5100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K5100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K5100M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | Quadro K5100M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 250% more power consumption, than Quadro K5100M.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K5100M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K5100M has 4 GB more memory, than FirePro S7000.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K5100M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K5100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 179 MHz higher, than Quadro K5100M.
- FirePro S7000 and Quadro K5100M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 1200 MHz higher, than Quadro K5100M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 46% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 45% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 27% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 24% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 52% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 30% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 44% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 35% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 9% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 35% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 45% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
FirePro S7000 and Quadro K5100M have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | Quadro K5100M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Pitcairn | N15E-Q5-A2 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 23 July 2013 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 771 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 98.69 |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 2,369 gflops |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | 35 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |