FirePro S9000 vs Quadro K5100M
When comparing FirePro S9000 and Quadro K5100M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S9000 and Quadro K5100M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S9000
Quadro K5100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K5100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K5100M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Quadro K5100M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 250% more power consumption, than Quadro K5100M.
- FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K5100M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K5100M has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro S9000.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K5100M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K5100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 129 MHz higher, than Quadro K5100M.
- FirePro S9000 and Quadro K5100M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 1900 MHz higher, than Quadro K5100M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 52% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 33% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 147% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 107% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 97% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 158% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S9000 | Quadro K5100M | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Tahiti | N15E-Q5-A2 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 24 August 2012 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 771 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 98.69 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 2,369 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 3600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | 35 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |