FireStream 9250 vs Quadro K5100M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9250 and Quadro K5100M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9250 and Quadro K5100M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9250
Quadro K5100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K5100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K5100M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9250 | Quadro K5100M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 50% more power consumption, than Quadro K5100M.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K5100M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K5100M has 7 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K5100M - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Quadro K5100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K5100M is 146 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K5100M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K5100M is 1614 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 260% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Battlefield 5 is 233% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 75% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Dota 2 is 65% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Far Cry 5 is 280% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Fortnite is 147% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 181% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 95% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Metro Exodus is 325% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Minecraft is 26% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in World of Tanks is 46% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9250 | Quadro K5100M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Kepler |
| Code name | RV770 | N15E-Q5-A2 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 771 MHz |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 98.69 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 2,369 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 3600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 35 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |