FireStream 9370 vs Quadro K5100M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FireStream 9370 and Quadro K5100M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FireStream 9370 stacks up against Quadro K5100M, check out specs charts below.
FireStream 9370
Quadro K5100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K5100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K5100M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9370 | Quadro K5100M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 125% more power consumption, than Quadro K5100M.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K5100M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K5100M has 4 GB more memory, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K5100M - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro K5100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 54 MHz higher, than Quadro K5100M.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K5100M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 1000 MHz higher, than Quadro K5100M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 15% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Battlefield 5 is 8% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9370 and Quadro K5100M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| FireStream 9370 and Quadro K5100M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Dota 2 is 3% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Far Cry 5 is 11% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Fortnite is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 12% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 11% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Minecraft is 5% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 7% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 13% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 9% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in World of Tanks is 5% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9370 | Quadro K5100M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
| Code name | Cypress | N15E-Q5-A2 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 23 June 2010 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 1600 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 771 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,154 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 98.69 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 2,369 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 3600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 35 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |