GeForce 820A vs Quadro K5100M
When comparing GeForce 820A and Quadro K5100M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 820A and Quadro K5100M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce 820A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro K5100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K5100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K5100M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 820A | Quadro K5100M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro K5100M has 566% more power consumption, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K5100M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K5100M has 7 GB more memory, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is used in Desktops, and Quadro K5100M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce 820A is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K5100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 820A is 4 MHz higher, than Quadro K5100M.
- GeForce 820A and Quadro K5100M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K5100M is 1800 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 446% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Dota 2 is 237% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Fortnite is 340% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 331% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 612% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | − | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in World of Tanks is 192% more, than GeForce 820A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 820A | Quadro K5100M | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GF117 | N15E-Q5-A2 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 23 July 2013 |
Pipelines | 96 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 771 MHz |
Transistor count | 585 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 12.40 | 98.69 |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 2,369 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 2.1 | + |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 35 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |