GeForce 920A vs Quadro K5100M
When choosing between GeForce 920A and Quadro K5100M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 920A and Quadro K5100M.
GeForce 920A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro K5100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K5100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K5100M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 920A | Quadro K5100M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro K5100M has 203% more power consumption, than GeForce 920A.
- GeForce 920A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro K5100M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K5100M has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce 920A.
- GeForce 920A is used in Desktops, and Quadro K5100M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce 920A is build with Kepler 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K5100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920A is 183 MHz higher, than Quadro K5100M.
- GeForce 920A and Quadro K5100M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K5100M is 1598 MHz higher, than GeForce 920A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 446% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Dota 2 is 237% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Fortnite is 340% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 331% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 612% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | − | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in World of Tanks is 192% more, than GeForce 920A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 920A | Quadro K5100M | |
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GK208B | N15E-Q5-A2 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 23 July 2013 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 771 MHz |
Transistor count | 915 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.53 | 98.69 |
Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 2,369 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.5 | + |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 35 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |