GeForce 940A vs Quadro K5100M
In this comparison between GeForce 940A and Quadro K5100M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 940A will be the best choice, for others Quadro K5100M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 940A
Quadro K5100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K5100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K5100M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 940A | Quadro K5100M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K5100M has 203% more power consumption, than GeForce 940A.
- GeForce 940A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro K5100M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K5100M has 7 GB more memory, than GeForce 940A.
- GeForce 940A is used in Desktops, and Quadro K5100M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce 940A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro K5100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 940A is 258 MHz higher, than Quadro K5100M.
- GeForce 940A and Quadro K5100M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K5100M is 1598 MHz higher, than GeForce 940A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 940A and Quadro K5100M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 87% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Dota 2 is 65% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Far Cry 5 is 185% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Fortnite is 118% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 191% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 115% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Minecraft is 27% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 137% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 211% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in World of Tanks is 61% more, than GeForce 940A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 940A | Quadro K5100M | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | GM108 | N15E-Q5-A2 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 13 March 2015 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 771 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.98 | 98.69 |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 2,369 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 3600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 35 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |