Quadro K5100M vs Radeon E8860
When comparing Quadro K5100M and Radeon E8860, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K5100M and Radeon E8860 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon E8860
Quadro K5100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K5100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K5100M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K5100M | Radeon E8860 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 37 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K5100M has 170% more power consumption, than Radeon E8860.
- Quadro K5100M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon E8860 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro K5100M has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon E8860.
- Quadro K5100M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon E8860 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K5100M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon E8860 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K5100M is 196 MHz higher, than Radeon E8860.
- Quadro K5100M and Radeon E8860 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon E8860 is 900 MHz higher, than Quadro K5100M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 80% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro K5100M and Radeon E8860 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 200−210 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 170−180 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 50% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Dota 2 is 43% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Far Cry 5 is 90% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Fortnite is 71% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 107% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 61% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 71% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in World of Tanks is 31% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K5100M | Radeon E8860 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N15E-Q5-A2 | Venus |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 | 25 January 2014 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 771 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 625 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 98.69 | 25.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,369 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 35 Mh/s | 48 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |