Quadro K5100M vs Radeon R9 370
When comparing Quadro K5100M and Radeon R9 370, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K5100M and Radeon R9 370 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R9 370
Quadro K5100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K5100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K5100M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K5100M | Radeon R9 370 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 110 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 370 has 10% more power consumption, than Quadro K5100M.
- Quadro K5100M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R9 370 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro K5100M has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 370.
- Quadro K5100M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 370 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K5100M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 370 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 370 is 154 MHz higher, than Quadro K5100M.
- Quadro K5100M and Radeon R9 370 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 370 is 2000 MHz higher, than Quadro K5100M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
low / 768p | 200−210 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 170−180 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 130−140 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 52% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Dota 2 is 33% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Far Cry 5 is 147% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 95−100 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Fortnite is 107% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 97% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 158% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Quadro K5100M. |
Full Specs
Quadro K5100M | Radeon R9 370 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N15E-Q5-A2 | Trinidad |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 23 July 2013 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 771 MHz | 925 MHz |
Boost Clock | 975 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 2,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 98.69 | 78.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,369 gflops | 2,496 gflops |
Length | 221 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 5600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 35 Mh/s | 336 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |