Quadro K5100M vs Radeon R9 M270X
When choosing between Quadro K5100M and Radeon R9 M270X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro K5100M and Radeon R9 M270X.
Radeon R9 M270X
Quadro K5100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K5100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K5100M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K5100M | Radeon R9 M270X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro K5100M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R9 M270X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro K5100M has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M270X.
- Quadro K5100M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 M270X - in Desktops.
- Quadro K5100M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K5100M is 46 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
- Quadro K5100M and Radeon R9 M270X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K5100M is 2475 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Quadro K5100M and Radeon R9 M270X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 200−210 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 170−180 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 63% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Dota 2 is 56% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Far Cry 5 is 111% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Fortnite is 77% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 125% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Metro Exodus is 133% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Minecraft is 21% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in World of Tanks is 36% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K5100M | Radeon R9 M270X | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N15E-Q5-A2 | Venus |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 | 21 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 771 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 98.69 | 31.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,369 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Shader Model | 5 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 35 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |