Quadro K5100M vs Tesla C2070
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro K5100M and Tesla C2070, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro K5100M stacks up against Tesla C2070, check out specs charts below.
Tesla C2070
Quadro K5100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K5100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K5100M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro K5100M | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 138% more power consumption, than Quadro K5100M.
- Quadro K5100M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro K5100M has 2 GB more memory, than Tesla C2070.
- Quadro K5100M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K5100M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K5100M is 197 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- Quadro K5100M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K5100M is 612 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 13% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 13% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 200−210 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 170−180 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 130−140 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 15% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 9% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 11% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 10% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 8% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 16% more, than Quadro K5100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5100M in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro K5100M | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Code name | N15E-Q5-A2 | GF100 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 771 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 98.69 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,369 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 35 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |