FirePro S9050 vs Quadro K5200

In this comparison between FirePro S9050 and Quadro K5200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S9050 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K5200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro S9050 Check Price

Quadro K5200 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro S9050	Quadro K5200
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	150 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	8 GB
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort	2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro S9050 has 50% more power consumption, than Quadro K5200.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
FirePro S9050 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro K5200.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro S9050 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro K5200 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FirePro S9050 is 233 MHz higher, than Quadro K5200.
FirePro S9050 and Quadro K5200 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro K5200 is 13 mm longer, than FirePro S9050.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K5200 is 508 MHz higher, than FirePro S9050.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	20−22	35−40
ultra / 1080p	12−14	21−24
QHD / 1440p	6−7	16−18
4K / 2160p	5−6	10−11
low / 720p	35−40	60−65
medium / 1080p	24−27	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 77% more, than FirePro S9050.
high / 1080p	30−35	55−60
ultra / 1080p	27−30	45−50
QHD / 1440p	10−12	35−40
4K / 2160p	7−8	18−20
low / 720p	65−70	100−110
medium / 1080p	35−40	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than FirePro S9050.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro S9050 and Quadro K5200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	230−240	250−260
medium / 768p	200−210	220−230
ultra / 1080p	110−120	180−190
QHD / 1440p	85−90	110−120
4K / 2160p	45−50	70−75
high / 768p	160−170	210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than FirePro S9050.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	−
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
FirePro S9050 and Quadro K5200 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	120−130
medium / 768p	100−110	110−120
ultra / 1080p	80−85	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Dota 2 is 10% more, than FirePro S9050.
high / 1080p	24−27	45−50
ultra / 1080p	21−24	40−45
QHD / 1440p	18−20	27−30
4K / 2160p	7−8	14−16
low / 720p	50−55	80−85
medium / 1080p	27−30	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Far Cry 5 is 72% more, than FirePro S9050.
high / 1080p	30−35	60−65
ultra / 1080p	24−27	45−50
QHD / 1440p	14−16	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	120−130	180−190
medium / 1080p	70−75	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Fortnite is 61% more, than FirePro S9050.
high / 1080p	30−35	60−65
ultra / 1080p	24−27	45−50
QHD / 1440p	12−14	30−35
4K / 2160p	12−14	24−27
low / 720p	65−70	100−110
medium / 1080p	35−40	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than FirePro S9050.
low / 768p	100−110	140−150
medium / 768p	90−95	120−130
high / 1080p	40−45	70−75
ultra / 1080p	16−18	30−35
QHD / 1440p	7−8	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 51% more, than FirePro S9050.
high / 1080p	12−14	24−27
ultra / 1080p	10−11	20−22
QHD / 1440p	10−11	16−18
4K / 2160p	2−3	8−9
low / 720p	40−45	65−70
medium / 1080p	16−18	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than FirePro S9050.
low / 768p	120−130	130−140
medium / 1080p	110−120	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Minecraft is 8% more, than FirePro S9050.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	70−75	100−110
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than FirePro S9050.
high / 1080p	14−16	24−27
ultra / 1080p	10−11	16−18
QHD / 1440p	1−2	10−11
4K / 2160p	1−2	7−8
low / 720p	35−40	65−70
medium / 1080p	20−22	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 92% more, than FirePro S9050.
low / 768p	70−75	130−140
medium / 768p	45−50	85−90
high / 1080p	24−27	45−50
ultra / 1080p	14−16	24−27
4K / 2160p	8−9	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 87% more, than FirePro S9050.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	50−55
high / 768p	55−60	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than FirePro S9050.

Full Specs

	FirePro S9050	Quadro K5200
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Kepler
Code name	Tahiti	GK110B
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	7 August 2014	22 July 2014
Pipelines	1792	2304
Core clock speed	900 MHz	667 MHz
Boost Clock		771 MHz
Transistor count	4,313 million	7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	100.8	148.0
Floating-point performance	3,226 gflops	3,553 gflops
Length	254 mm	267 mm
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	6008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	264 GB/s	192.3 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA		3.5
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		226 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro S9050 vs Quadro K5200

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares