FireStream 9370 vs Quadro K5200

When comparing FireStream 9370 and Quadro K5200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9370 and Quadro K5200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FireStream 9370

Quadro K5200 Check Price

Main Specs

	FireStream 9370	Quadro K5200
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	150 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort	2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
		Check Price

FireStream 9370 has 50% more power consumption, than Quadro K5200.
FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K5200 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro K5200 has 4 GB more memory, than FireStream 9370.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro K5200 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 158 MHz higher, than Quadro K5200.
FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K5200 - by 28 nm process technology.
Both graphics cards are the same length of 267 mm.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K5200 is 1408 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	12−14	35−40
ultra / 1080p	7−8	21−24
QHD / 1440p	2−3	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	27−30	60−65
medium / 1080p	16−18	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 176% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	21−24	55−60
ultra / 1080p	18−20	45−50
QHD / 1440p	4−5	35−40
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
low / 720p	45−50	100−110
medium / 1080p	21−24	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Battlefield 5 is 169% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	190−200	250−260
medium / 768p	160−170	220−230
ultra / 1080p	85−90	180−190
QHD / 1440p	45−50	110−120
4K / 2160p	30−33	70−75
high / 768p	120−130	210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 63% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	100−110	120−130
medium / 768p	85−90	110−120
ultra / 1080p	55−60	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	14−16	45−50
ultra / 1080p	14−16	40−45
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	5−6	14−16
low / 720p	30−35	80−85
medium / 1080p	16−18	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Far Cry 5 is 176% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	21−24	60−65
ultra / 1080p	16−18	45−50
QHD / 1440p	16−18	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	85−90	180−190
medium / 1080p	45−50	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Fortnite is 128% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	21−24	60−65
ultra / 1080p	16−18	45−50
QHD / 1440p	7−8	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	24−27
low / 720p	45−50	100−110
medium / 1080p	24−27	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 162% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	75−80	140−150
medium / 768p	65−70	120−130
high / 1080p	24−27	70−75
ultra / 1080p	10−11	30−35
QHD / 1440p	1−2	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 119% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	8−9	24−27
ultra / 1080p	6−7	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	2−3	8−9
low / 720p	24−27	65−70
medium / 1080p	10−12	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Metro Exodus is 210% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	100−110	130−140
ultra / 1080p	95−100	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Minecraft is 23% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	50−55	100−110
medium / 1080p	21−24	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	12−14	24−27
ultra / 1080p	9−10	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	24−27	65−70
medium / 1080p	14−16	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	45−50	130−140
medium / 768p	27−30	85−90
high / 1080p	16−18	45−50
ultra / 1080p	9−10	24−27
4K / 2160p	7−8	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 181% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	95−100	90−95
medium / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	30−35	50−55
high / 768p	50−55	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in World of Tanks is 11% more, than FireStream 9370.

Full Specs

	FireStream 9370	Quadro K5200
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Kepler
Code name	Cypress	GK110B
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	23 June 2010	22 July 2014
Pipelines	1600	2304
Core clock speed	825 MHz	667 MHz
Boost Clock		771 MHz
Transistor count	2,154 million	7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	66.00	148.0
Floating-point performance	2,640.0 gflops	3,553 gflops
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4600 MHz	6008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	147.2 GB/s	192.3 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		3.5
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		226 Mh/s
		Check Price

FireStream 9370 vs Quadro K5200

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares