GeForce GTS 360M vs Quadro K5200
In this comparison between GeForce GTS 360M and Quadro K5200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTS 360M will be the best choice, for others Quadro K5200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTS 360M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 360M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 360M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 360M
Quadro K5200
Power consumption (TDP)
38 Watt
150 Watt
Interface
MXM-II
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1x 6-pin
Memory type
DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
8 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K5200 has 294% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 360M.
GeForce GTS 360M is connected by MXM-II, and Quadro K5200 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro K5200 has 7 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 360M.
GeForce GTS 360M is used in Laptops, and Quadro K5200 - in Desktops.
GeForce GTS 360M is build with GT2xx architecture, and Quadro K5200 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 360M is 769 MHz higher, than Quadro K5200.
GeForce GTS 360M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K5200 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
35−40
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
1−2
60−65
medium / 1080p
0−1
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
−
55−60
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
0−1
100−110
medium / 1080p
−
60−65
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTS 360M and Quadro K5200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
60−65
250−260
medium / 768p
27−30
220−230
ultra / 1080p
7−8
180−190
QHD / 1440p
−
110−120
4K / 2160p
−
70−75
high / 768p
16−18
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
GeForce GTS 360M and Quadro K5200 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
45−50
120−130
medium / 768p
10−11
110−120
ultra / 1080p
0−1
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
−
45−50
ultra / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
14−16
low / 720p
0−1
80−85
medium / 1080p
−
45−50
high / 1080p
−
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
21−24
180−190
medium / 1080p
0−1
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Fortnite is 740% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
0−1
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
0−1
100−110
medium / 1080p
0−1
65−70
low / 768p
18−20
140−150
medium / 768p
−
120−130
high / 1080p
0−1
70−75
ultra / 1080p
−
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 720p
0−1
65−70
medium / 1080p
−
30−35
low / 768p
75−80
130−140
high / 1080p
27−30
−
medium / 1080p
−
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Minecraft is 75% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
8−9
100−110
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
0−1
65−70
medium / 1080p
−
35−40
low / 768p
0−1
130−140
medium / 768p
−
85−90
high / 1080p
−
45−50
ultra / 1080p
−
24−27
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
50−55
high / 768p
12−14
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in World of Tanks is 188% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 360M
Quadro K5200
Architecture
GT2xx
Kepler
Code name
N11E-GS1
GK110B
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
7 January 2010
22 July 2014
Pipelines
96
2304
Core clock speed
1436 MHz
667 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
Transistor count
727 million
7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
17.60
148.0
Floating-point performance
275.71 gflops
3,553 gflops
Length
267 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
6008 MHz
Memory bandwidth
57.6 GB/s
192.3 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
4.1
5.1
OpenGL
2.1
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
3.5
CUDA cores
96
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
226 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Gigaflops
413
MXM Type
MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management
8.0
Check Price
Check Price