GRID K260Q vs Quadro K5200

In this comparison between GRID K260Q and Quadro K5200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K260Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro K5200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GRID K260Q

Quadro K5200 Check Price

Main Specs

	GRID K260Q	Quadro K5200
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	150 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
		Check Price

GRID K260Q has 50% more power consumption, than Quadro K5200.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro K5200 has 6 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K260Q and Quadro K5200 are build with Kepler architecture.
Core clock speed of GRID K260Q is 78 MHz higher, than Quadro K5200.
GRID K260Q and Quadro K5200 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K5200 is 1008 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	35−40
ultra / 1080p	9−10	21−24
QHD / 1440p	3−4	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	30−35	60−65
medium / 1080p	18−20	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	55−60
ultra / 1080p	21−24	45−50
QHD / 1440p	7−8	35−40
4K / 2160p	5−6	18−20
low / 720p	50−55	100−110
medium / 1080p	27−30	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Battlefield 5 is 134% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	210−220	250−260
medium / 768p	180−190	220−230
ultra / 1080p	95−100	180−190
QHD / 1440p	50−55	110−120
4K / 2160p	30−33	70−75
high / 768p	140−150	210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	110−120	120−130
medium / 768p	90−95	110−120
ultra / 1080p	60−65	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Dota 2 is 27% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	18−20	45−50
ultra / 1080p	16−18	40−45
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	6−7	14−16
low / 720p	35−40	80−85
medium / 1080p	18−20	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Far Cry 5 is 147% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	45−50
QHD / 1440p	16−18	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	95−100	180−190
medium / 1080p	50−55	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Fortnite is 107% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	60−65
ultra / 1080p	20−22	45−50
QHD / 1440p	9−10	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	24−27
low / 720p	50−55	100−110
medium / 1080p	27−30	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	85−90	140−150
medium / 768p	75−80	120−130
high / 1080p	30−33	70−75
ultra / 1080p	12−14	30−35
QHD / 1440p	3−4	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 88% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	9−10	24−27
ultra / 1080p	7−8	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	2−3	8−9
low / 720p	27−30	65−70
medium / 1080p	12−14	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	110−120	130−140
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	100−110
medium / 1080p	24−27	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	14−16	24−27
ultra / 1080p	9−10	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	27−30	65−70
medium / 1080p	16−18	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	55−60	130−140
medium / 768p	30−35	85−90
high / 1080p	18−20	45−50
ultra / 1080p	10−12	24−27
4K / 2160p	8−9	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 148% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	50−55
high / 768p	50−55	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in World of Tanks is 4% more, than GRID K260Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K260Q	Quadro K5200
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Code name	GK104	GK110B
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	28 June 2013	22 July 2014
Pipelines	1536	2304
Core clock speed	745 MHz	667 MHz
Boost Clock		771 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	148.0
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops	3,553 gflops
Length		267 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	6008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	192.3 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0	3.5
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		226 Mh/s
		Check Price

GRID K260Q vs Quadro K5200

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares