Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Quadro K5200
In this comparison between Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Quadro K5200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Plus Graphics 645 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K5200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Quadro K5200
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
150 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
Memory type
DDR3/DDR4
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
8 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K5200 has 900% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro K5200 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K5200 - in Desktops.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is build with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake architecture, and Quadro K5200 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K5200 is 367 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro K5200 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
35−40
ultra / 1080p
2−3
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
12−14
60−65
medium / 1080p
5−6
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
−
55−60
ultra / 1080p
7−8
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
16−18
100−110
medium / 1080p
8−9
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Battlefield 5 is 545% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
100−110
250−260
medium / 768p
80−85
220−230
ultra / 1080p
35−40
180−190
QHD / 1440p
24−27
110−120
4K / 2160p
−
70−75
high / 768p
60−65
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 220% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
65−70
120−130
medium / 768p
45−50
110−120
ultra / 1080p
21−24
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Dota 2 is 155% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
5−6
45−50
ultra / 1080p
5−6
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
3−4
14−16
low / 720p
12−14
80−85
medium / 1080p
5−6
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
12−14
60−65
ultra / 1080p
8−9
45−50
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
45−50
180−190
medium / 1080p
12−14
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Fortnite is 410% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
8−9
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
16−18
100−110
medium / 1080p
9−10
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 609% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
40−45
140−150
medium / 768p
35−40
120−130
high / 1080p
7−8
70−75
ultra / 1080p
5−6
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 304% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
3−4
24−27
ultra / 1080p
2−3
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
7−8
65−70
medium / 1080p
4−5
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
85−90
130−140
high / 1080p
80−85
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
−
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
100−110
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 142% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
7−8
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
7−8
65−70
medium / 1080p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
16−18
130−140
medium / 768p
12−14
85−90
high / 1080p
6−7
45−50
ultra / 1080p
5−6
24−27
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 630% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
50−55
high / 768p
30−33
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Quadro K5200
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake
Kepler
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
GK110B
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
10 July 2019
22 July 2014
Pipelines
48
2304
Core clock speed
300 MHz
667 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
771 MHz
Transistor count
7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
50.40
148.0
Floating-point performance
3,553 gflops
Length
267 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
6008 MHz
Memory bandwidth
192.3 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.103
1.1.126
CUDA
3.5
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
226 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
