Quadro 2000 vs Quadro K5200

When comparing Quadro 2000 and Quadro K5200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 2000 and Quadro K5200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

Quadro 2000 Check Price

Quadro K5200 Check Price

Main Specs

	Quadro 2000	Quadro K5200
Power consumption (TDP)	62 Watt	150 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K5200 has 141% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000.
Quadro 2000 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K5200 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro K5200 has 7 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro 2000 is build with Fermi architecture, and Quadro K5200 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K5200 is 42 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000.
Quadro 2000 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K5200 - by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro K5200 is 89 mm longer, than Quadro 2000.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K5200 is 3408 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	1−2	35−40
ultra / 1080p	0−1	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	10−12	60−65
medium / 1080p	2−3	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 840% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p	−	55−60
ultra / 1080p	3−4	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	35−40
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
low / 720p	12−14	100−110
medium / 1080p	4−5	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Battlefield 5 is 914% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro 2000 and Quadro K5200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	110−120	250−260
medium / 768p	85−90	220−230
ultra / 1080p	35−40	180−190
QHD / 1440p	−	110−120
4K / 2160p	10−11	70−75
high / 768p	60−65	210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 206% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
Quadro 2000 and Quadro K5200 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	70−75	120−130
medium / 768p	45−50	110−120
ultra / 1080p	18−20	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Dota 2 is 150% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p	2−3	45−50
ultra / 1080p	2−3	40−45
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	0−1	14−16
low / 720p	10−11	80−85
medium / 1080p	3−4	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p	−	60−65
ultra / 1080p	5−6	45−50
QHD / 1440p	1−2	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	45−50	180−190
medium / 1080p	8−9	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Fortnite is 526% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p	3−4	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	24−27
low / 720p	14−16	100−110
medium / 1080p	5−6	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 875% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p	40−45	140−150
medium / 768p	−	120−130
high / 1080p	3−4	70−75
ultra / 1080p	2−3	30−35
QHD / 1440p	0−1	21−24
medium / 720p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p	1−2	24−27
ultra / 1080p	0−1	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	0−1	8−9
low / 720p	3−4	65−70
medium / 1080p	2−3	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p	85−90	130−140
high / 1080p	55−60	−
medium / 1080p	−	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	24−27	100−110
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	3−4	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	4−5	65−70
medium / 1080p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 950% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p	8−9	130−140
medium / 768p	7−8	85−90
high / 1080p	3−4	45−50
ultra / 1080p	3−4	24−27
4K / 2160p	0−1	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1360% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p	70−75	90−95
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	12−14	50−55
high / 768p	30−33	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Quadro 2000.

Full Specs

	Quadro 2000	Quadro K5200
Architecture	Fermi	Kepler
Code name	GF106	GK110B
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	24 December 2010	22 July 2014
Pipelines	192	2304
Core clock speed	625 MHz	667 MHz
Boost Clock		771 MHz
Transistor count	1,170 million	7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	20.00	148.0
Floating-point performance	480.0 gflops	3,553 gflops
Length	178 mm	267 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	2600 MHz	6008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	41.6 GB/s	192.3 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA	2.1	3.5
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	31 Mh/s	226 Mh/s
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro 2000 vs Quadro K5200

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares