Quadro FX 4800 vs Quadro K5200

In this comparison between Quadro FX 4800 and Quadro K5200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro FX 4800 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K5200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro FX 4800

Quadro K5200 Check Price

Main Specs

	Quadro FX 4800	Quadro K5200
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	150 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1536 MB	8 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video	2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
		Check Price

Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 150 Watt.
Quadro FX 4800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K5200 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro FX 4800 has 1528 GB more memory, than Quadro K5200.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro FX 4800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Quadro K5200 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K5200 is 65 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K5200 - by 28 nm process technology.
Both graphics cards are the same length of 267 mm.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K5200 is 4408 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	35−40
ultra / 1080p	0−1	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	12−14	60−65
medium / 1080p	3−4	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
high / 1080p	−	55−60
ultra / 1080p	4−5	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	35−40
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
low / 720p	14−16	100−110
medium / 1080p	5−6	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Battlefield 5 is 787% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro FX 4800 and Quadro K5200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	120−130	250−260
medium / 768p	90−95	220−230
ultra / 1080p	35−40	180−190
QHD / 1440p	21−24	110−120
4K / 2160p	16−18	70−75
high / 768p	65−70	210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 195% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
low / 768p	65−70	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
low / 768p	75−80	120−130
medium / 768p	45−50	110−120
ultra / 1080p	20−22	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Dota 2 is 139% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
high / 1080p	2−3	45−50
ultra / 1080p	2−3	40−45
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	2−3	14−16
low / 720p	10−11	80−85
medium / 1080p	3−4	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
high / 1080p	10−11	60−65
ultra / 1080p	5−6	45−50
QHD / 1440p	3−4	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	50−55	180−190
medium / 1080p	10−11	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Fortnite is 443% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
high / 1080p	5−6	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	3−4	30−35
4K / 2160p	2−3	24−27
low / 720p	16−18	100−110
medium / 1080p	8−9	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
low / 768p	45−50	140−150
medium / 768p	−	120−130
high / 1080p	4−5	70−75
ultra / 1080p	2−3	30−35
QHD / 1440p	0−1	21−24
medium / 720p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
high / 1080p	1−2	24−27
ultra / 1080p	0−1	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	0−1	8−9
low / 720p	4−5	65−70
medium / 1080p	3−4	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
low / 768p	90−95	130−140
high / 1080p	80−85	−
ultra / 1080p	70−75	−
medium / 1080p	85−90	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Minecraft is 44% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	27−30	100−110
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	6−7	65−70
medium / 1080p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
low / 768p	9−10	130−140
medium / 768p	8−9	85−90
high / 1080p	4−5	45−50
ultra / 1080p	3−4	24−27
4K / 2160p	1−2	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than Quadro FX 4800.
low / 768p	70−75	90−95
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	12−14	50−55
high / 768p	30−35	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Quadro FX 4800.

Full Specs

	Quadro FX 4800	Quadro K5200
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Kepler
Code name	GT200B	GK110B
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	11 November 2008	22 July 2014
Pipelines	192	2304
Core clock speed	602 MHz	667 MHz
Boost Clock		771 MHz
Transistor count	1,400 million	7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	38.53	148.0
Floating-point performance	462.3 gflops	3,553 gflops
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1600 MHz	6008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	76.8 GB/s	192.3 GB/s
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	4.0	5.1
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA	1.3	3.5
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		226 Mh/s
		Check Price

Quadro FX 4800 vs Quadro K5200

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares