Quadro K5200 vs Quadro M2000

In this comparison between Quadro K5200 and Quadro M2000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K5200 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M2000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro K5200 Check Price

Quadro M2000 Check Price

Main Specs

	Quadro K5200	Quadro M2000
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5	128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	4x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K5200 has 100% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro K5200 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro M2000.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro K5200 is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M2000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 129 MHz higher, than Quadro K5200.
Quadro K5200 and Quadro M2000 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Quadro K5200 is 66 mm longer, than Quadro M2000.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 604 MHz higher, than Quadro K5200.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	35−40	21−24
ultra / 1080p	21−24	12−14
QHD / 1440p	16−18	6−7
4K / 2160p	10−11	5−6
low / 720p	60−65	40−45
medium / 1080p	40−45	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 68% more, than Quadro M2000.
high / 1080p	55−60	30−35
ultra / 1080p	45−50	27−30
QHD / 1440p	35−40	12−14
4K / 2160p	18−20	8−9
low / 720p	100−110	65−70
medium / 1080p	60−65	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Battlefield 5 is 74% more, than Quadro M2000.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro K5200 and Quadro M2000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	250−260	230−240
medium / 768p	220−230	200−210
ultra / 1080p	180−190	120−130
QHD / 1440p	110−120	90−95
4K / 2160p	70−75	50−55
high / 768p	210−220	170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 20% more, than Quadro M2000.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	50−55
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
Quadro K5200 and Quadro M2000 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	120−130
medium / 768p	110−120	100−110
ultra / 1080p	100−110	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Dota 2 is 10% more, than Quadro M2000.
high / 1080p	45−50	24−27
ultra / 1080p	40−45	21−24
QHD / 1440p	27−30	18−20
4K / 2160p	14−16	8−9
low / 720p	80−85	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Far Cry 5 is 65% more, than Quadro M2000.
high / 1080p	60−65	30−35
ultra / 1080p	45−50	24−27
QHD / 1440p	27−30	16−18
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
low / 720p	180−190	120−130
medium / 1080p	110−120	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Fortnite is 61% more, than Quadro M2000.
high / 1080p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	45−50	27−30
QHD / 1440p	30−35	14−16
4K / 2160p	24−27	12−14
low / 720p	100−110	70−75
medium / 1080p	65−70	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 64% more, than Quadro M2000.
low / 768p	140−150	100−110
medium / 768p	120−130	95−100
high / 1080p	70−75	40−45
ultra / 1080p	30−35	16−18
QHD / 1440p	21−24	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 49% more, than Quadro M2000.
high / 1080p	24−27	12−14
ultra / 1080p	20−22	10−11
QHD / 1440p	16−18	10−11
4K / 2160p	8−9	3−4
low / 720p	65−70	40−45
medium / 1080p	30−35	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than Quadro M2000.
low / 768p	130−140	120−130
medium / 1080p	120−130	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Quadro M2000.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	100−110	70−75
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than Quadro M2000.
high / 1080p	24−27	16−18
ultra / 1080p	16−18	10−11
QHD / 1440p	10−11	2−3
4K / 2160p	7−8	1−2
low / 720p	65−70	40−45
medium / 1080p	35−40	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 68% more, than Quadro M2000.
low / 768p	130−140	75−80
medium / 768p	85−90	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	24−27
ultra / 1080p	24−27	14−16
4K / 2160p	16−18	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 82% more, than Quadro M2000.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	40−45
high / 768p	60−65	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Quadro M2000.

Full Specs

	Quadro K5200	Quadro M2000
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	GK110B	GM206
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	22 July 2014	8 April 2016
Pipelines	2304	768
Core clock speed	667 MHz	796 MHz
Boost Clock	771 MHz	1163 MHz
Transistor count	7,080 million	2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	148.0	55.82
Floating-point performance	3,553 gflops	1,812 gflops
Length	267 mm	201 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz	6612 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.3 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	+
CUDA	3.5	5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	226 Mh/s	215 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays		4
nView Desktop Management		+
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K5200 vs Quadro M2000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares