Quadro K5200 vs Radeon Pro 450
In this comparison between Quadro K5200 and Radeon Pro 450 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K5200 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 450 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro 450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 450 here:
Main Specs
Quadro K5200
Radeon Pro 450
Power consumption (TDP)
150 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
8 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K5200 has 328% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 450.
Quadro K5200 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 450 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Quadro K5200 has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 450.
Quadro K5200 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 450 - in Mobile workstations.
Quadro K5200 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 450 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 450 is 133 MHz higher, than Quadro K5200.
Quadro K5200 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 450 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K5200 is 928 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 450.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
35−40
14−16
ultra / 1080p
21−24
8−9
QHD / 1440p
16−18
3−4
4K / 2160p
10−11
−
low / 720p
60−65
27−30
medium / 1080p
40−45
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 157% more, than Radeon Pro 450.
high / 1080p
55−60
21−24
ultra / 1080p
45−50
18−20
QHD / 1440p
35−40
5−6
4K / 2160p
18−20
5−6
low / 720p
100−110
45−50
medium / 1080p
60−65
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Battlefield 5 is 170% more, than Radeon Pro 450.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 450.
low / 768p
250−260
200−210
medium / 768p
220−230
170−180
ultra / 1080p
180−190
90−95
QHD / 1440p
110−120
50−55
4K / 2160p
70−75
30−33
high / 768p
210−220
130−140
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 53% more, than Radeon Pro 450.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
−
35−40
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro 450.
low / 768p
120−130
100−110
medium / 768p
110−120
90−95
ultra / 1080p
100−110
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Dota 2 is 33% more, than Radeon Pro 450.
high / 1080p
45−50
16−18
ultra / 1080p
40−45
14−16
QHD / 1440p
27−30
−
4K / 2160p
14−16
5−6
low / 720p
80−85
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Far Cry 5 is 161% more, than Radeon Pro 450.
high / 1080p
60−65
21−24
ultra / 1080p
45−50
18−20
QHD / 1440p
27−30
16−18
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
low / 720p
180−190
90−95
medium / 1080p
110−120
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Fortnite is 123% more, than Radeon Pro 450.
high / 1080p
60−65
24−27
ultra / 1080p
45−50
18−20
QHD / 1440p
30−35
8−9
4K / 2160p
24−27
−
low / 720p
100−110
45−50
medium / 1080p
65−70
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 152% more, than Radeon Pro 450.
low / 768p
140−150
80−85
medium / 768p
120−130
70−75
high / 1080p
70−75
27−30
ultra / 1080p
30−35
10−12
QHD / 1440p
21−24
2−3
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 102% more, than Radeon Pro 450.
high / 1080p
24−27
9−10
ultra / 1080p
20−22
7−8
QHD / 1440p
16−18
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
2−3
low / 720p
65−70
27−30
medium / 1080p
30−35
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than Radeon Pro 450.
low / 768p
130−140
110−120
ultra / 1080p
−
100−110
medium / 1080p
120−130
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon Pro 450.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
low / 720p
100−110
50−55
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than Radeon Pro 450.
high / 1080p
24−27
14−16
ultra / 1080p
16−18
9−10
QHD / 1440p
10−11
0−1
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
24−27
medium / 1080p
35−40
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 125% more, than Radeon Pro 450.
low / 768p
130−140
50−55
medium / 768p
85−90
30−35
high / 1080p
45−50
16−18
ultra / 1080p
24−27
10−11
4K / 2160p
16−18
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 158% more, than Radeon Pro 450.
low / 768p
90−95
100−105
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
30−35
high / 768p
60−65
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5200 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Radeon Pro 450.
Full Specs
Quadro K5200
Radeon Pro 450
Architecture
Kepler
Polaris
Code name
GK110B
Polaris 11
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
22 July 2014
27 October 2016
Pipelines
2304
640
Core clock speed
667 MHz
800 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
Transistor count
7,080 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
148.0
32.00
Floating-point performance
3,553 gflops
1,024 gflops
Length
267 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6008 MHz
5080 MHz
Memory bandwidth
192.3 GB/s
81.28 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
3.5
FreeSync
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
226 Mh/s
127 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price
