GRID K520 vs Quadro K600

When comparing GRID K520 and Quadro K600, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K520 and Quadro K600 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

• GRID K520 has 448% more power consumption, than Quadro K600.
• GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K600 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
• GRID K520 has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro K600.
• Both cards are used in Desktops.
• GRID K520 and Quadro K600 are build with Kepler architecture.
• Core clock speed of Quadro K600 is 131 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
• GRID K520 and Quadro K600 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
• GRID K520 is 107 mm longer, than Quadro K600.
• Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 3218 MHz higher, than Quadro K600.