Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Quadro K600
When comparing Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Quadro K600, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Quadro K600 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Quadro K600
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
41 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
32 GB
1 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K600 has 173% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro K600 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 31 GB more memory, than Quadro K600.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K600 - in Desktops.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro K600 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K600 is 576 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro K600 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
0−1
ultra / 1080p
4−5
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
1−2
medium / 1080p
8−9
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1600% more, than Quadro K600.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
0−1
medium / 1080p
12−14
−
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K600 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
130−140
60−65
medium / 768p
110−120
27−30
ultra / 1080p
50−55
7−8
QHD / 1440p
27−30
−
4K / 2160p
27−30
−
high / 768p
80−85
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 242% more, than Quadro K600.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
18−20
0−1
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K600 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
low / 768p
80−85
45−50
medium / 768p
55−60
10−11
ultra / 1080p
30−35
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Dota 2 is 141% more, than Quadro K600.
high / 1080p
8−9
−
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
4K / 2160p
3−4
−
low / 720p
18−20
0−1
medium / 1080p
8−9
−
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
−
low / 720p
60−65
21−24
medium / 1080p
21−24
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Fortnite is 181% more, than Quadro K600.
high / 1080p
12−14
0−1
ultra / 1080p
10−12
−
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
0−1
medium / 1080p
14−16
0−1
low / 768p
50−55
18−20
medium / 768p
45−50
−
high / 1080p
12−14
0−1
ultra / 1080p
6−7
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Grand Theft Auto V is 173% more, than Quadro K600.
high / 1080p
4−5
−
ultra / 1080p
3−4
−
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
12−14
0−1
medium / 1080p
6−7
−
low / 768p
95−100
75−80
high / 1080p
90−95
27−30
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in Minecraft is 79% more, than Quadro K600.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
low / 720p
30−35
8−9
medium / 1080p
18−20
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 300% more, than Quadro K600.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
12−14
0−1
medium / 1080p
10−12
−
low / 768p
24−27
0−1
medium / 768p
16−18
−
high / 1080p
9−10
−
ultra / 1080p
6−7
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
low / 768p
85−90
45−50
medium / 768p
45−50
14−16
ultra / 1080p
18−20
0−1
high / 768p
35−40
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 640 in World of Tanks is 128% more, than Quadro K600.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Quadro K600
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Kepler
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
GK107
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
3 January 2017
1 March 2013
Pipelines
48
192
Core clock speed
300 MHz
876 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
52.80
14.02
Floating-point performance
336.4 gflops
Length
160 mm
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1782 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.51 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.103
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
11 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price
