Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Quadro K600

    When comparing Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Quadro K600, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Quadro K600 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
    Iris Plus Graphics 655 Check Price
    Quadro K600 Check Price

    Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card

    Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:

    Iris Plus Graphics 655 Laptops

    Main Specs

      Iris Plus Graphics 655 Quadro K600
    Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 41 Watt
    Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 2.0 x16
    Supplementary power connectors None
    Memory type DDR3/DDR4 DDR3
    Maximum RAM amount 1 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
      Check Price Check Price
    • Quadro K600 has 173% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 655 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Quadro K600 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 655 is used in Laptops, and Quadro K600 - in Desktops.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 655 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Quadro K600 - with Kepler.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro K600 is 576 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Quadro K600 - by 28 nm process technology.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 12−14 0−1
    ultra / 1080p 7−8 −
    QHD / 1440p 2−3 0−1
    low / 720p 27−30 1−2
    medium / 1080p 16−18 0−1
    The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than Quadro K600.

    Full Specs

      Iris Plus Graphics 655 Quadro K600
    Architecture Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake Kepler
    Code name Kaby Lake GT3e GK107
    Type Laptop Workstation
    Release date 1 September 2017 1 March 2013
    Pipelines 48 192
    Core clock speed 300 MHz 876 MHz
    Boost Clock 1200 MHz
    Transistor count 189 million 1,270 million
    Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
    Texture fill rate 50.40 14.02
    Floating-point performance 336.4 gflops
    Length 160 mm
    Memory bus width 128 Bit
    Memory clock speed 1782 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 28.51 GB/s
    Shared memory +
    DirectX 12 (12_1) 12 (11_0)
    Shader Model 6.4 5.1
    OpenGL 4.6 4.6
    OpenCL 2.1 1.2
    Vulkan 1.1.103 1.1.126
    CUDA 3.0
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 11 Mh/s
    Quick Sync +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares