Quadro K3000M vs Quadro K600

When comparing Quadro K3000M and Quadro K600, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K3000M and Quadro K600 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

• Quadro K3000M has 82% more power consumption, than Quadro K600.
• Quadro K3000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro K600 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
• Quadro K3000M has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro K600.
• Quadro K3000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro K600 - in Desktops.
• Quadro K3000M and Quadro K600 are build with Kepler architecture.
• Core clock speed of Quadro K600 is 222 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
• Quadro K3000M and Quadro K600 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
• Memory clock speed of Quadro K3000M is 1018 MHz higher, than Quadro K600.